The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The efficacy of a brief internet-based self-help intervention for the bereaved
Open accessAbstract
Research so far has shown little evidence that written disclosure facilitates recovery from bereavement. There are good reasons to assume that written disclosure may only benefit those bereaved who are at risk for developing problems or who are experiencing significant psychological problems as a result of their loss, and only when appropriate writing instructions are used. Drawing on previous work in the area of post-traumatic stress, a writing intervention was designed to test these assumptions. Bereaved individuals, who were still significantly distressed by their loss, were randomly assigned to the intervention condition (N = 460) or a waiting-list control condition (N = 297). Both groups filled in questionnaires online at baseline, and 3 and 6 months later. The intervention was administered via e-mail immediately after baseline measurement. Results showed that writing decreased feelings of emotional loneliness and increased positive mood, in part through its effect on rumination. However, writing did not affect grief or depressive symptoms. Contrary to expectations, effects did not depend on participants' risk profile or baseline distress level. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“in studies where an online intervention was carried out in which the patient has to write a letter to the deceased person, the researchers concluded that this activity alone was efficient in reducing emotional loneliness and increasing the state of positive mood, as well as its effect on rumination; however, no effects were observed in terms of grief and depression symptoms (Van der Houwen et al.,”
From A Self-Applied Multi-Component Psychological Online Intervention Based on UX, for the Prevention of Complicated Grief Disorder in the Mexican Population During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Protocol of a Randomized Clinical Trial (2021) · cites this paper as Van der Houwen et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Nevertheless, in an internet-based intervention comprising five structured confrontational writing assignments, for individuals who experienced the death of a first-degree relative and who were significantly distressed, although writing decreased feelings of emotional loneliness and increased positive mood, writing did not affect grief or depressive symptoms.”
From Efficacy of internet-based integrated intervention on depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as van der Houwen et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
Multilevel analysis techniques and applications
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · Cited by 6,006
Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
MacKinnon, D. P. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203809556 · Cited by 5,618
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,214
Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research
Pervin, L. A. (1992) · Cited by 4,543
Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.4.569 · Cited by 4,529
An Item-Response Theory Analysis of Self-Report Measures of Adult Attachment
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350 · Cited by 3,385
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–106 of 106
Talbot, F., Talbot, T., Fournier, V., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.10.357
Gouveia, A., Mendonça, N., Marques, M. M., Mousinho, M. F. D. A., Gaspar, A. C., Pinto, C. C., Lopes, D. G., Brodbeck, J., Rodrigues, A. M., & Pires, A. M. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.70013
Lewis, C. M., Smalley, M., Phillips, D. M., Snell, G. D., Thomas, B., Yun, J. W. S., & Bisson, J. I. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5835565/v1
Co-production of Spring PGD : a guided digital therapy for prolonged grief disorder (PGD)
Lewis, C., Smalley, M., Kitchiner, N., Roberts, N. P., & Bisson, J. I. (2025) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2551402 · Cited by 1
Tur, C., Campos, D., Díaz-Sanahuja, L., Fernández-Buendía, S., Grimaldos, J., de la Coba-Cañizares, L., Kazlauskas, E., & Quero, S. (2025) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.3390/bs15101312
Egan, S. J., Zammit, T., O’Brien, A., Greene, D., Pauley-Gadd, S. B., Bills, E., MYERS, B. J., Hall, C., Wilson, H., Duffy, M., et al. (2026) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2026.101008
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Houwen, K., Schut, H., van den Bout, J., Stroebe, M., & Stroebe, W.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 359-367
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091171011
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- bereavement, grief, writing intervention, expressive writing, online self-help, rumination, emotional loneliness, positive mood, depressive symptoms, grief symptoms, post-traumatic stress, risk profile
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bereavement, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Writing, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Statistics, Nonparametric, Internet, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
