Cost of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme: An analysis of cost of session, treatment and recovery in selected Primary Care Trusts in the East of England region
Abstract
Recent literature on Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) has reported on improvements in clinical outcomes, changes in employment status and the concept of recovery attributable to IAPT treatment, but not on the costs of the programme. This article reports the costs associated with a single session, completed course of treatment and recovery for four treatment courses (i.e., remaining in low or high intensity treatment, stepping up or down) in IAPT services in 5 East of England region Primary Care Trusts. Costs were estimated using treatment activity data and gross financial information, along with assumptions about how these financial data could be broken down. The estimated average cost of a high intensity session was £177 and the average cost for a low intensity session was £99. The average cost of treatment was £493 (low intensity), £1416 (high intensity), £699 (stepped down), £1514 (stepped up) and £877 (All). The cost per recovered patient was £1043 (low intensity), £2895 (high intensity), £1653 (stepped down), £2914 (stepped up) and £1766 (All). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the costs are sensitive to cost ratio assumptions, indicating that inaccurate ratios are likely to influence overall estimates. Results indicate the cost per session exceeds previously reported estimates, but cost of treatment is only marginally higher. The current cost estimates are supportive of the originally proposed IAPT model on cost-benefit grounds. The study also provides a framework to estimate costs using financial data, especially when programmes have block contract arrangements. Replication and additional analyses along with evidence-based discussion regarding alternative, cost-effective methods of intervention is recommended.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The current average cost per recovered patient is £1043 for a low-intensity psychological treatment (e.g. guided self-help CBT, group CBT) in the East of England, and this increases to £2895 per recovered patient if a high-intensity psychological treatment is offered (e.g. 16 sessions of in-person CBT).
“The current average cost per recovered patient is £1043 for a low-intensity psychological treatment (e.g. guided self-help CBT, group CBT) in the East of England, and this increases to £2895 per recovered patient if a high-intensity psychological treatment is offered (e.g. 16 sessions of in-person CBT)”
From Internet-delivered guided self-help acceptance and commitment therapy for family carers of people with dementia (iACT4CARERS): a feasibility study. (2022) · cites this paper as Radhakrishnan et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Radhakrishnan, M., Hammond, G., Jones, P. B., Watson, A., McMillan-Shields, F., & Lafortune, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Radhakrishnan, Muralikrishnan
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-45
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055424630
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1335, NF-SI-0509-10215)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, treatment costs, recovery cost, stepped care, low-intensity treatment, primary care mental health services, cost-benefit analysis, East of England
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Employment, England, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychotherapy, State Medicine, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Health Care Costs, Evidence-Based Medicine, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review