Reductions in negative repetitive thinking and metacognitive beliefs during transdiagnostic internet cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for mixed anxiety and depression
Abstract
We explored whether transdiagnostic internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for mixed anxiety and depression effectively reduces repetitive negative thinking (RNT), and whether reductions in RNT and positive metacognitive beliefs mediate symptom improvement during iCBT. Participants with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), major depressive disorder (MDD), or mixed GAD/MDD diagnoses were randomly allocated to a 6-lesson clinician-guided iCBT anxiety and depression program (n = 46) or wait-list control (WLC, n = 53). Depression (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety (GAD-7), RNT (Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire) and positive beliefs about RNT (Positive Beliefs about Rumination Scale) were assessed at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment or matched time points for WLC. Tests of serial indirect effects explored the potential meditating role of RNT and positive belief reductions on the impact of iCBT on depression and anxiety symptoms post-treatment. Results showed that both RNT frequency and positive beliefs about the value of RNT reduced significantly following iCBT compared to WLC, with gains maintained at 3-month follow-up. Reductions between pre- and mid-treatment in positive beliefs and RNT mediated improvements in depression symptoms post-iCBT, and reductions in positive beliefs mediated improvements in GAD symptoms. These findings indicate that iCBT is an effective treatment for RNT and positive metacognitive beliefs. Future dismantling studies are needed to assess the most effective treatment components.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Between 45 and 60% of participants do not demonstrate clinically reliable change in either the core symptoms of depression and anxiety, or the transdiagnostic factors, such as repetitive negative thinking, that cause and maintain symptoms.
“In addition, between 45 and 60% of participants do not demonstrate clinically reliable change in either the core symptoms of depression and anxiety, or the transdiagnostic factors, such as repetitive negative thinking, that cause and maintain symptoms (Newby et al., 2014).”
From Online mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression: Outcomes of a pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Newby et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Newby, J. M., Williams, A. D., & Andrews, G.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Newby, Jill M.
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 52-60
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015381762
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1037787, 630746)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- repetitive negative thinking, metacognitive beliefs, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, transdiagnostic treatment, mixed anxiety-depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, rumination, maintenance therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review