Cited by 78Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Reductions in negative repetitive thinking and metacognitive beliefs during transdiagnostic internet cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for mixed anxiety and depression

Newby, Jill M., Williams, Alishia D., Andrews, Gavin·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

We explored whether transdiagnostic internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for mixed anxiety and depression effectively reduces repetitive negative thinking (RNT), and whether reductions in RNT and positive metacognitive beliefs mediate symptom improvement during iCBT. Participants with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), major depressive disorder (MDD), or mixed GAD/MDD diagnoses were randomly allocated to a 6-lesson clinician-guided iCBT anxiety and depression program (n = 46) or wait-list control (WLC, n = 53). Depression (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety (GAD-7), RNT (Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire) and positive beliefs about RNT (Positive Beliefs about Rumination Scale) were assessed at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment or matched time points for WLC. Tests of serial indirect effects explored the potential meditating role of RNT and positive belief reductions on the impact of iCBT on depression and anxiety symptoms post-treatment. Results showed that both RNT frequency and positive beliefs about the value of RNT reduced significantly following iCBT compared to WLC, with gains maintained at 3-month follow-up. Reductions between pre- and mid-treatment in positive beliefs and RNT mediated improvements in depression symptoms post-iCBT, and reductions in positive beliefs mediated improvements in GAD symptoms. These findings indicate that iCBT is an effective treatment for RNT and positive metacognitive beliefs. Future dismantling studies are needed to assess the most effective treatment components.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.05.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between 45 and 60% of participants do not demonstrate clinically reliable change in either the core symptoms of depression and anxiety, or the transdiagnostic factors, such as repetitive negative thinking, that cause and maintain symptoms.

    “In addition, between 45 and 60% of participants do not demonstrate clinically reliable change in either the core symptoms of depression and anxiety, or the transdiagnostic factors, such as repetitive negative thinking, that cause and maintain symptoms (Newby et al., 2014).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 78

Authors
Newby, J. M., Williams, A. D., & Andrews, G.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Newby, Jill M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
59
Pages
52-60
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015381762
Cited by
78
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (1037787, 630746)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
repetitive negative thinking, metacognitive beliefs, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, transdiagnostic treatment, mixed anxiety-depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, rumination, maintenance therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review