Cited by 93Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Computerised CBT for depressed adolescents: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Smith, Patrick, Scott, Rebecca, Eshkevari, Ertimiss, Jatta, Fatoumata, Leigh, Eleanor, Harris, Victoria, Robinson, Alex, Abeles, Paul +3 more·2015·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background Depression in adolescents is a common and impairing problem. Effective psychological therapies for depression are not accessed by most adolescents. Computerised therapy offers huge potential for improving access to treatment.Aims To test the efficacy of Stressbusters, a Computerised-CBT (C-CBT) programme for depression in young people.Method Multi-site, schools-based, RCT of C-CBT compared to Waiting List, for young people (N = 112; aged 12-16) with significant symptoms of depression, using multiple-informants (adolescents, parents, teachers), with follow-up at 3 and 6 months.Results Relative to being on a Waiting List, C-CBT was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms of depression and anxiety according to adolescent self-report; and with a trend towards improvements in depression and anxiety according to parent-report. Improvements were maintained at follow-up. Treatment gains were similar for boys and girls across the participating age range. Treatment effect was partially mediated by changes in ruminative thinking. Teachers rated adolescents as having few emotional or behavioural problems, both before and after intervention. C-CBT had no detectable effect on academic attainment. In the month after intervention, young people who received C-CBT had significantly fewer absences from school than those on the Waiting List.Conclusions C-CBT shows considerable promise for the treatment of mild-moderate depression in adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 93

Authors
Smith, P., Scott, R., Eshkevari, E., Jatta, F., Leigh, E., Harris, V., Robinson, A., Abeles, P., Proudfoot, J., Verduyn, C., & Yule, W.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Patrick
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
73
Pages
104-110
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2210204420
Cited by
93
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Guy's & St Thomas' Charity, London (G100111)
  • Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research
  • NHS Foundation Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
computerized cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescent depression, school-based intervention, access to psychological treatment, ruminative thinking, anxiety symptoms, maintenance therapy, school absenteeism, gender differences in treatment response
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review