Computerised CBT for depressed adolescents: randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Depression in adolescents is a common and impairing problem. Effective psychological therapies for depression are not accessed by most adolescents. Computerised therapy offers huge potential for improving access to treatment.Aims To test the efficacy of Stressbusters, a Computerised-CBT (C-CBT) programme for depression in young people.Method Multi-site, schools-based, RCT of C-CBT compared to Waiting List, for young people (N = 112; aged 12-16) with significant symptoms of depression, using multiple-informants (adolescents, parents, teachers), with follow-up at 3 and 6 months.Results Relative to being on a Waiting List, C-CBT was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms of depression and anxiety according to adolescent self-report; and with a trend towards improvements in depression and anxiety according to parent-report. Improvements were maintained at follow-up. Treatment gains were similar for boys and girls across the participating age range. Treatment effect was partially mediated by changes in ruminative thinking. Teachers rated adolescents as having few emotional or behavioural problems, both before and after intervention. C-CBT had no detectable effect on academic attainment. In the month after intervention, young people who received C-CBT had significantly fewer absences from school than those on the Waiting List.Conclusions C-CBT shows considerable promise for the treatment of mild-moderate depression in adolescents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBT-based interventions significantly reduce rumination.
“In addition, according to randomized controlled studies (Smith et al., 2015; Topper et al., 2017; Watkins et al., 2011), CBT-based interventions showed a significant reduction in rumination.”
From Reducing Test Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2024) · cites this paper as Smith et al., 2015
Overall 76% of the studies included in the review as a whole, and all but 4 studies included in the meta-analysis, had some risk of bias.
“Overall 76% of the studies included in the review as a whole, and all but 4 studies (43, 66, 68, 74) included in the meta-analysis had some risk of bias.”
From What Works and What Doesn’t Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People (2019) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Smith, P., Scott, R., Eshkevari, E., Jatta, F., Leigh, E., Harris, V., Robinson, A., Abeles, P., Proudfoot, J., Verduyn, C., & Yule, W.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Patrick
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 104-110
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2210204420
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Guy's & St Thomas' Charity, London (G100111)
- Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research
- NHS Foundation Trust
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- computerized cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescent depression, school-based intervention, access to psychological treatment, ruminative thinking, anxiety symptoms, maintenance therapy, school absenteeism, gender differences in treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review