Cited by 21Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The causes and consequences of shame in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Visvalingam, Shanara, Crone, Cassandra, Street, Simon, Oar, Ella L., Gilchrist, Philippe, Norberg, Melissa M.·2022·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Research into the aetiology, maintenance, and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has largely been informed by models of anxiety. However, non-experimental research suggests that some individuals may engage in compulsions to neutralise shame, with repugnant obsessions associated with more shame than other obsessions. Violent and sexual obsessions and shame have been linked with poorer treatment outcomes, and thus, treatment modifications are needed. This experimental study aimed to examine if and how shame fits into a cognitive behavioural model of OCD. Fifty-five individuals experiencing subclinical (n = 9) to clinical (n = 46) OCD symptoms were randomly administered four different obsession induction paradigms focused on harm, sexual, contamination, and symmetry obsessions. After each induction, participants reported on their emotional states, gave appraisal ratings regarding their urges to engage in compulsions and avoidant behaviour, and completed manipulation checks. Harm and sexual inductions elicited greater shame and anxiety and were considered more immoral than contamination and symmetry inductions. Shame responses were also independently associated with compulsion and avoidance behaviours in repugnant obsessions, controlling for anxiety. Theoretical models and treatment for OCD should be adapted to address shame.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 84 · Cited by 21

Authors
Visvalingam, S., Crone, C., Street, S., Oar, E. L., Gilchrist, P., & Norberg, M. M.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Norberg, Melissa M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
151
Pages
104064
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213024284
Cited by
21
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
shame, obsessive-compulsive disorder, sexual obsessions, contamination obsessions, compulsive behavior, avoidance behavior, cognitive-behavioral model, anxiety, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Obsessive Behavior, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Shame

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review