Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Breast cancer management in low resource countries (LRCs): Consensus statement from the Breast Health Global Initiative

Open access
El Saghir, Nagi S., Adebamowo, Clement A., Anderson, Benjamin O., Carlson, Robert W., Bird, Peter A., Corbex, Marilys, Badwe, Rajendra A., Bushnaq, Mohammad A., Eniu, Alexandru, Gralow, Julie R., Harness, Jay K., Masetti, Riccardo, Perry, Fernando, Samiei, Massoud, Thomas, David B., Wiafe-Addai, Beatrice, Cazap, Eduardo·2011·The Breast

Abstract

The Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) brought together international breast cancer experts to discuss breast cancer in low resource countries (LRCs) and identify common concerns reviewed in this consensus statement. There continues to be a lack of public and health care professionals' awareness of the importance of early detection of breast cancer. Mastectomy continues to be the most common treatment for breast cancer; and a lack of surgeons and anesthesia services was identified as a contributing factor in delayed surgical therapy in LRCs. Where available, radiation therapy is still more likely to be used for palliation rather than for curative treatment. Tumor receptor status is often suboptimally performed due to lack of advanced pathology services and variable quality control of tissue handling and processing. Regional pathology services can be a cost-effective approach and can serve as reference, training and research centers. Limited availability of medical oncologists in LRCs often results in non-specialist providing chemotherapeutic services, which requires additional supervision and training. Palliative care is an emerging field in LRCs that requires investment in training and infrastructure development. A commitment and investment in the development of breast cancer care services by LRC governments and health authorities remains a critical need in LRCs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.breast.2011.02.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
El Saghir, N. S., Adebamowo, C. A., Anderson, B. O., Carlson, R. W., Bird, P. A., Corbex, M., Badwe, R. A., Bushnaq, M. A., Eniu, A., Gralow, J. R., Harness, J. K., Masetti, R., Perry, F., Samiei, M., Thomas, D. B., Wiafe-Addai, B., & Cazap, E.
Venue
The Breast
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
20
Pages
S3-S11
ISSN
0960-9776 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134484332
Cited by
237
References
2
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast cancer management in low resource countries (LRCs): Consensus statement from the Breast Health Global Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.breast.2011.02.006
The paper
El Saghir, N. S., Adebamowo, C. A., Anderson, B. O., Carlson, R. W., Bird, P. A., Corbex, M., Badwe, R. A., Bushnaq, M. A., Eniu, A., Gralow, J. R., Harness, J. K., Masetti, R., Perry, F., Samiei, M., Thomas, D. B., Wiafe-Addai, B., & Cazap, E. (2011). Breast cancer management in low resource countries (LRCs): Consensus statement from the Breast Health Global Initiative. The Breast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.02.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.