Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique that delivers low-intensity, direct current to cortical areas facilitating or inhibiting spontaneous neuronal activity. In the past 10 years, tDCS physiologic mechanisms of action have been intensively investigated giving support for the investigation of its applications in clinical neuropsychiatry and rehabilitation. However, new methodologic, ethical, and regulatory issues emerge when translating the findings of preclinical and phase I studies into phase II and III clinical studies. The aim of this comprehensive review is to discuss the key challenges of this process and possible methods to address them.Methods We convened a workgroup of researchers in the field to review, discuss, and provide updates and key challenges of tDCS use in clinical research.Main findings/discussion We reviewed several basic and clinical studies in the field and identified potential limitations, taking into account the particularities of the technique. We review and discuss the findings into four topics: (1) mechanisms of action of tDCS, parameters of use and computer-based human brain modeling investigating electric current fields and magnitude induced by tDCS; (2) methodologic aspects related to the clinical research of tDCS as divided according to study phase (ie, preclinical, phase I, phase II, and phase III studies); (3) ethical and regulatory concerns; and (4) future directions regarding novel approaches, novel devices, and future studies involving tDCS. Finally, we propose some alternative methods to facilitate clinical research on tDCS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children and adolescents show accelerated neural plasticity compared to adults after brain stimulation.
“In fact, children and adolescents show accelerated neural plasticity compared to adults after brain stimulation (Brunoni et al., 2012).”
From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Brunoni et al., 2012
Section 3.4, “TDCS in children” (page not provided), describes childhood and adolescence as phases of intensive brain development and plasticity, and says tDCS could induce neuroplastic changes. It does not report that brain stimulation produces faster plasticity in children or adolescents than in adults. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an effective non-invasive technique for research with both healthy and clinical subjects in the domain of social cognition.
“Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to be an effective non-invasive technique for research conducted with both healthy8 and clinical subjects9 in the domain of social cognition10.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 156 · Cited by 1,445
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [147]Reis J Robertson E Krakauer JW Rothwell J Marshall L Gerloff C Consensus: "Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?" Brain Stimul 2008 10 1 4 363 369 PMC2621080 20633394
- Authors
- Brunoni, A. R., Nitsche, M. A., Bolognini, N., Bikson, M., Wagner, T., Merabet, L., Edwards, D. J., Valero-Cabre, A., Rotenberg, A., Pascual-Leone, A., Ferrucci, R., Priori, A., Boggio, P. S., & Fregni, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
- City College of New York (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
- Burke Medical Research Institute (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- University of Milan (IT)
- Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fregni, Felipe
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brain stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-195
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- PMC
- PMC3270156
- OpenAlex
- W2165530068
- Cited by
- 1,445
- References
- 156
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (R21HD060999, 5R21DK081773-03)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, neuromodulation, clinical translation, mechanism of action, regulatory challenges, neuropsychiatry, rehabilitation, non-invasive brain stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Brain Diseases, Forecasting, Humans, Biomedical Research, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review