Association of cerebral metabolic activity changes with vagus nerve stimulation antidepressant response in treatment-resistant depression
Open accessAbstract
Background Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has antidepressant effects in treatment resistant major depression (TRMD); these effects are poorly understood. This trial examines associations of subacute (3 months) and chronic (12 months) VNS with cerebral metabolism in TRMD.Objective (17)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was used to examine associations between 12-month antidepressant VNS response and cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRGlu) changes at 3 and 12 months.Methods Thirteen TRMD patients received 12 months of VNS. Depression assessments (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS]) and PET scans were obtained at baseline (pre-VNS) and 3/12 months. CMRGlu was assessed in eight a priori selected brain regions (bilateral anterior insular [AIC], orbitofrontal [OFC], dorsolateral prefrontal [DLPFC], and anterior cingulate cortices [ACC]). Regional CMRGlu changes over time were studied in VNS responders (decreased 12 month HDRS by ≥50%) and nonresponders.Results A significant trend (decreased 3 month CMRGlu) in the right DLPFC was observed over time in VNS responders (n = 9; P = 0.006). An exploratory whole brain analysis (P(uncorrected) = 0.005) demonstrated decreased 3 month right rostral cingulate and DLPFC CMRGlu, and increased 12 month left ventral tegmental CMRGlu in responders.Conclusions/limitations VNS response may involve gradual (months in duration) brain adaptations. Early on, this process may involve decreased right-sided DLPFC/cingulate cortical activity; longer term effects (12 months) may lead to brainstem dopaminergic activation. Study limitations included: a) a small VNS nonresponders sample (N = 4), which limited conclusions about nonresponder CMRGlu changes; b) no control group; and, c) patients maintained their psychotropic medications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Short-term (14 days) and long-term (12 months) VNS in treatment of resistant major depression may lead to brainstem dopaminergic activation.
“In case of DA, it has been shown that the short-term effects (14 days) (94) and the long-term effects (12 months) (97) of VNS in treatment of resistant major depression may lead to brainstem dopaminergic activation.”
From Vagus Nerve as Modulator of the Brain–Gut Axis in Psychiatric and Inflammatory Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as [97]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 75
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [21]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders, patient edition (SCID-P) Version 2 New York New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research 1995
- Authors
- Conway, C. R., Chibnall, J. T., Gebara, M. A., Price, J. L., Snyder, A. Z., Mintun, M. A., Craig, A. D. (., Cornell, M. E., Perantie, D. C., Giuffra, L. A., Bucholz, R. D., & Sheline, Y. I.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Conway, Charles R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brain Stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 788-797
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- PMC
- PMC3954813
- OpenAlex
- W2002022114
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- National Institute of Mental Health (1K08MH078156-01A1, 9K24MH07951006)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS048056)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- vagus nerve stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, antidepressant response, brain glucose metabolism, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, ventral tegmental area, brain adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Positron-Emission Tomography, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review