Cited by 67Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

An Eight-week, Open-trial, Pilot Feasibility Study of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation in Youth With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Open access
McGough, James J., Loo, Sandra K., Sturm, Alexandra, Cowen, Jennifer, Leuchter, Andrew F., Cook, Ian A.·2015·Brain stimulation

Abstract

Background This study examined the potential feasibility and utility of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in youth.Methods Twenty-four participants ages 7-14 with ADHD enrolled in an 8-week open trial of TNS administered nightly during sleep, and were assessed weekly with parent- and physician-completed measures of ADHD symptoms and executive functioning as well as measures of treatment compliance, adverse events, and side effects. Computerized tests of cognitive functioning were administered at baseline and weeks 4 and 8.Results Significant improvements were seen on the ADHD-IV Rating Scale (P < .0001) and parent-completed Conners Global Index (P < .0001), as well as the majority of scales on the parent-completed Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF). Improvements were also noted on the computerized Attention Network Task (ANT) Incongruent Reaction Time (P = .006), suggesting that TNS has positive effects on response inhibition.Conclusions TNS therapy for youth with ADHD appears to be both feasible and without significant risk. Subjective improvements on rating scales and laboratory measures of cognition suggest a potential role for TNS in treating ADHD that merits further investigation. Future research in anticipation of designing definitive controlled efficacy trials should evaluate time to onset of TNS response and durability of treatment effects following TNS discontinuation, as well as validate an effective active sham comparator suitable for blinded studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 67

Authors
McGough, J. J., Loo, S. K., Sturm, A., Cowen, J., Leuchter, A. F., & Cook, I. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
McGough, James J.
Venue
Brain stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
299-304
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2167095726
Cited by
67
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
trigeminal nerve stimulation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, youth, executive function, response inhibition, ADHD symptom improvement, treatment feasibility, adverse events, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Trigeminal Nerve, Treatment Outcome, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review