Cited by 141Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchTactile and Sensory Interactions

Inter-subject and Inter-session Variability of Plasticity Induction by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: Boon or Bane?

Open access
Ziemann, Ulf, Siebner, Hartwig R.·2015·Brain Stimulation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.409

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziemann, U., & Siebner, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
Venue
Brain Stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
662-663
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2120169804
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lundbeckfonden (R59-2010-5399)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
non-invasive brain stimulation, interindividual variability, inter-session variability, neuroplasticity, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review