Cited by 96Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Induces Brain Morphological Changes in Regions Associated with a Treatment Resistant Major Depressive Episode: An Exploratory Analysis

Open access
Lan, Martin J., Chhetry, Binod Thapa, Liston, Conor, Mann, J. John, Dubin, Marc·2016·Brain Stimulation

Abstract

Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an FDA-approved antidepressant treatment but little is known of its mechanism of action. Specifically, downstream effects of TMS remain to be elucidated.Objective/hypothesis This study aims to identify brain structural changes from TMS treatment of a treatment resistant depressive episode through an exploratory analysis.Methods Twenty-seven subjects in a DSM-IV current major depressive episode and on a stable medication regimen had a 3T magnetic resonance T1 structural scan before and after five weeks of standard TMS treatment to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Twenty-seven healthy volunteer (HVs) subjects had the same brain MRI acquisition. Voxel-based morphometry was performed using high dimensional non-linear diffusomorphic anatomical registration (DARTEL).Results Six clusters of gray matter volume (GMV) that were lower in pre-treatment MRIs of depressed subjects than in HVs. GMV in four of these regions increased in MDD after TMS treatment by 3.5-11.2%. The four brain regions that changed with treatment were centered in the left anterior cingulate cortex, the left insula, the left superior temporal gyrus and the right angular gyrus. Increases in the anterior cingulate GMV with TMS correlated with improvement in depression severity.Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study of brain structural changes during TMS treatment of depression. The affected brain areas are involved in cognitive appraisal, decision-making and subjective experience of emotion. These effects may have potential relevance for the antidepressant action of TMS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2016.02.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment increased gray matter volume in the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex, and such volumetric increases correlated with symptom reduction.

    “These findings replicated prior results showing that left dlPFC rTMS treatment increased GMV in the pgACC (Fig. 4c) and such volumetric increases correlated with symptom reduction [91].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Results (Imaging Results; page unavailable) report increased anterior cingulate gray matter volume after TMS and a correlation between that change and reduced depression severity. Our copy identifies the region as the left anterior cingulate, not specifically the perigenual ACC; it also notes that the correlation was not corrected for multiple comparisons. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 96

Authors
Lan, M. J., Chhetry, B. T., Liston, C., Mann, J. J., & Dubin, M.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Lan, Martin J.
Venue
Brain Stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
577-583
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2292600623
Cited by
96
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • Department of Psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College
  • National Institutes of Health (K23MH104688, K99 MH097822)
  • DeWitt Wallace Reader's Digest Foundation
  • Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive episode, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, gray matter volume, brain structural changes, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, superior temporal gyrus, angular gyrus, antidepressant mechanism, voxel-based morphometry, DARTEL
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review