Cited by 446Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation

Open access
Cirillo, G., Di Pino, G., Capone, F., Ranieri, F., Florio, L., Todisco, V., Tedeschi, G., Funke, K. +1 more·2017·Brain Stimulation

Abstract

Background In recent years, many studies have evaluated the effects of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques for the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric disorders. Positive results led to approval of NIBS for some of these conditions by the Food and Drug Administration in the USA. The therapeutic effects of NIBS have been related to bi-directional changes in cortical excitability with the direction of change depending on the choice of stimulation protocol. Although after-effects are mostly short lived, complex neurobiological mechanisms related to changes in synaptic excitability bear the potential to further induce therapy-relevant lasting changes. Objective To review recent neurobiological findings obtained from in vitro and in vivo studies that highlight molecular and cellular mechanisms of short- and long-term changes of synaptic plasticity after NIBS. Findings Long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) phenomena by itself are insufficient in explaining the early and long term changes taking place after short episodes of NIBS. Preliminary experimental studies indicate a complex scenario potentially relevant to the therapeutic effects of NIBS, including gene activation/regulation, de novo protein expression, morphological changes, changes in intrinsic firing properties and modified network properties resulting from changed inhibition, homeostatic processes and glial function. Conclusions This review brings into focus the neurobiological mecha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-treatment cognitive testing took place right after brain stimulation, so the potential long-term effect of NIBS on cognition remains understudied.

    “Also, post-treatment cognitive testing took place right after brain stimulation and therefore the potential long-term effect of NIBS on cognition remains understudied (Cirillo et al., 2017; Gersner, Kravetz, Feil, Pell, & Zangen, 2011).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 191 · Cited by 446

Authors
Cirillo, G., Di Pino, G., Capone, F., Ranieri, F., Florio, L., Todisco, V., Tedeschi, G., Funke, K., & Di Lazzaro, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Brain Stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2557185620
Cited by
446
References
191
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
non-invasive brain stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, cortical excitability, gene expression changes, glial function, neurobiological mechanisms, aftereffects
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Brain, Depression, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Stereotaxic Techniques, Long-Term Potentiation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review