Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
Open accessAbstract
Background In recent years, many studies have evaluated the effects of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques for the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric disorders. Positive results led to approval of NIBS for some of these conditions by the Food and Drug Administration in the USA. The therapeutic effects of NIBS have been related to bi-directional changes in cortical excitability with the direction of change depending on the choice of stimulation protocol. Although after-effects are mostly short lived, complex neurobiological mechanisms related to changes in synaptic excitability bear the potential to further induce therapy-relevant lasting changes. Objective To review recent neurobiological findings obtained from in vitro and in vivo studies that highlight molecular and cellular mechanisms of short- and long-term changes of synaptic plasticity after NIBS. Findings Long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) phenomena by itself are insufficient in explaining the early and long term changes taking place after short episodes of NIBS. Preliminary experimental studies indicate a complex scenario potentially relevant to the therapeutic effects of NIBS, including gene activation/regulation, de novo protein expression, morphological changes, changes in intrinsic firing properties and modified network properties resulting from changed inhibition, homeostatic processes and glial function. Conclusions This review brings into focus the neurobiological mecha…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Post-treatment cognitive testing took place right after brain stimulation, so the potential long-term effect of NIBS on cognition remains understudied.
“Also, post-treatment cognitive testing took place right after brain stimulation and therefore the potential long-term effect of NIBS on cognition remains understudied (Cirillo et al., 2017; Gersner, Kravetz, Feil, Pell, & Zangen, 2011).”
From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Cirillo et al., 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 191 · Cited by 446
- Authors
- Cirillo, G., Di Pino, G., Capone, F., Ranieri, F., Florio, L., Todisco, V., Tedeschi, G., Funke, K., & Di Lazzaro, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Venue
- Brain Stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- OpenAlex
- W2557185620
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 191
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 11
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doaj.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- non-invasive brain stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, cortical excitability, gene expression changes, glial function, neurobiological mechanisms, aftereffects
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Mental Disorders, Brain, Depression, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Stereotaxic Techniques, Long-Term Potentiation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review