Cited by 142Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A frontal-vagal network theory for Major Depressive Disorder: Implications for optimizing neuromodulation techniques

Open access
Iseger, Tabitha A., van Bueren, Nienke E.R., Kenemans, J. Leon, Gevirtz, Richard, Arns, Martijn·2020·Brain Stimulation

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a psychiatric disorder characterized by high comorbidity with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, a combination of high heart rate (HR) and low heart rate variability (HRV) has been frequently reported in depressed patients. The present review proposes a frontal-vagal (brain-heart) network that overlaps with functional nodes of the depression network. Moreover, we summarize neuromodulation studies that have targeted key nodes in this depression network, with subsequent impact on heart rate (HR) or heart-rate-variability (HRV), such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), and the vagus nerve (VN). Based on the interplay of this frontal-vagal network, we emphasize the importance of including HR and HRV measurements in human depression studies, in particular those that conduct neuromodulation, in order to obtain a better understanding of the pathways that are affected, and we explore the possibilities of using this frontal-vagal interplay as a method for target engagement in neuromodulation treatments. This frontal-vagal network theory opens-up the possibility for individualizing neuromodulation treatments such as rTMS. A recent development called Neuro-Cardiac-Guided TMS (NCG-TMS), was developed based on this theory, and an individual-participant meta-analysis is presented. Four studies provide consistent and replicable support for NCG-TMS as a target engagement method, with consistent HR deceleration during frontal TMS and HR acceleration during motor strip TMS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.006

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Visual overview of sympathetic and parasympathetic brain-heart connections. Anatomical and functional connections between the brain, spinal cord and the heart for the sympathetic pathway (accelerator nerve, indicated in green) and the parasympathetic pathway (vagus nerve, indicated in blue).
Fig. 1 Visual overview of sympathetic and parasympathetic brain-heart connections. Anatomical and functional connections between the brain, spinal cord and the heart for the sympathetic pathway (accelerator nerve, indicated in green) and the parasympathetic pathway (vagus nerve, indicated in blue).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Example of the NCG-TMS method.
Fig. 2 Example of the NCG-TMS method.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Results from the individual participant meta-analysis, pooling the results from 4 studies.
Fig. 3 Results from the individual participant meta-analysis, pooling the results from 4 studies.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. T.A. Iseger, F. Padberg, J.L. Kenemans, H. van Dijk & M. Arns. Neuro-cardiac-guided TMS: a validation study (under review at NeuroImage).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Iseger, T. A., van Bueren, N. E. R., Kenemans, J. L., Gevirtz, R., & Arns, M.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Alliant University (US)
Corresponding author
Arns, Martijn
Venue
Brain Stimulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-861X
OpenAlex
W2979927084
Cited by
142
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 15
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain stimulation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, heart rate variability, heart rate, vagus nerve, neuromodulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, heart-brain interaction, cardiovascular comorbidity
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Gyrus Cinguli, Heart Rate, Humans, Motor Cortex, Vagus Nerve, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review