Cited by 34Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Patch-based interpretable deep learning framework for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis using multimodal data

Zhang, Heng, Ni, Ming, Yang, Yi, Xie, Fang, Wang, Weiyi, He, Yutao, Chen, Weiqiang, Chen, Zhi·2025·Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107085

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Ni, M., Yang, Y., Xie, F., Wang, W., He, Y., Chen, W., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Weiqiang
  • Chen, Zhi
Venue
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-02
Volume
100
Pages
107085
ISSN
1746-8094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403562985
Cited by
34
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, mild cognitive impairment, multimodal fusion, explainable deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging, PET, Mini-Mental State Examination, early diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review