The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings
Open accessAbstract
Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in office buildings has been positively correlated to self-estimated job performance and, potentially, to overall company productivity. LEED is a voluntary, consensus-based, market-driven program that provides third-party certification of green buildings, contributing to promote sustainability into the mainstream of building design and construction. From the literature, however, it is unclear the extent to which LEED certification also improves occupant satisfaction with IEQ. The aim of this paper is to study if LEED certified buildings lead to a higher, equal or lower satisfaction with indoor environmental quality than non-LEED rated buildings. Occupant satisfaction has been evaluated on a subset of the Center for the Built Environment Occupant Indoor Environmental Quality Survey database featuring 144 buildings (65 LEED certified) and 21,477 individual occupant responses (10,129 in LEED buildings). Differently from previous studies of the CBE database, the results show that occupants of LEED certified buildings have equal satisfaction with the building overall and with the workspace than occupants of non-LEED rated buildings. The difference in mean satisfaction scores between LEED and non-LEED buildings for other 15 IEQ parameters investigated is always lower than 6% with a negligible effect size. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is not a significant influence of LEED certification on occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality, although the analysis of mean votes of satisfaction reveals that occupants of LEED buildings tend to be slightly more satisfied with air quality, and slightly more dissatisfied with amount of light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
Ferguson, C. J. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0015808 · Cited by 3,467
Cited by
A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment
Rupp, R. F., Vásquez, N. G., & Lamberts, R. (2015) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.047 · Cited by 907
Al horr, Y., Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A., & Elsarrag, E. (2016) · International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment · doi:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006 · Cited by 817
Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment
Altomonte, S., Allen, J., Bluyssen, P. M., Brager, G., Heschong, L., Loder, A., Schiavon, S., Veitch, J. A., Wang, L., & Wargocki, P. (2020) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949 · Cited by 303
Self-citationKim, H. G., & Kim, S. S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12052109 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Altomonte, S., & Schiavon, S.
- Venue
- Building and Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 66-76
- ISSN
- 0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029679246
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008
- The paper
- Altomonte, S., & Schiavon, S. (2013). Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.