The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outdoor thermal comfort within five different urban forms in the Netherlands
Open accessAbstract
Outdoor thermal comfort in urban spaces is known as an important contributor to pedestrians' health. The urban microclimate is also important more generally through its influence on urban air quality and the energy use of buildings. These issues are likely to become more acute as increased urbanisation and climate change exacerbate the urban heat island effect. Careful urban planning, however, may be able to provide for cooler urban environments. Different urban forms provide different microclimates with different comfort situations for pedestrians. In this paper, singular East–West and North–South, linear East–West and North–South, and a courtyard form were analysed for the hottest day so far in the temperate climate of the Netherlands (19th June 2000 with the maximum 33 °C air temperature). ENVI-met was used for simulating outdoor air temperature, mean radiant temperature, wind speed and relative humidity whereas RayMan was used for converting these data into Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET). The models with different compactness provided different thermal environments. The results demonstrate that duration of direct sun and mean radiant temperature, which are influenced by urban form, play the most important role in thermal comfort. This paper also shows that the courtyard provides the most comfortable microclimate in the Netherlands in June compared to the other studied urban forms. The results are validated through a field measurement and calibration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · Cited by 11,456
Thom, E. C. (1959) · Weatherwise · doi:10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960 · Cited by 1,527
Comparison of UTCI to selected thermal indices
Blazejczyk, K., Epstein, Y., Jendritzky, G., Staiger, H., & Tinz, B. (2012) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-011-0453-2 · Cited by 1,129
Lindberg, F., Holmer, B., & Thorsson, S. (2008) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-008-0162-7 · Cited by 574
Cited by
Lai, D., Liu, W., Gan, T., Liu, K., & Chen, Q. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.062 · Cited by 851
A review on the CFD analysis of urban microclimate
Toparlar, Y., Blocken, B., Maiheu, B., & van Heijst, G. J. F. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.248 · Cited by 759
Review on the impact of urban geometry and pedestrian level greening on outdoor thermal comfort
Jamei, E., Rajagopalan, P., Seyedmahmoudian, M., & Jamei, Y. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.104 · Cited by 587
Lee, H., Mayer, H., & Chen, L. (2016) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.004 · Cited by 508
Zölch, T., Maderspacher, J., Wamsler, C., & Pauleit, S. (2016) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.011 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Taleghani, M., Kleerekoper, L., Tenpierik, M., & van den Dobbelsteen, A.
- Venue
- Building and Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 65-78
- ISSN
- 0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003523195
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outdoor thermal comfort within five different urban forms in the Netherlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.014
- The paper
- Taleghani, M., Kleerekoper, L., Tenpierik, M., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2015). Outdoor thermal comfort within five different urban forms in the Netherlands. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.