The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach
Abstract
Abstract There is increasing interest in the study of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of buildings, which entails an estimate of the potential environmental impacts and resource use of buildings. This is driven by increasing awareness of the environmental impact of buildings, as well as the emergence of enabling tools for their assessment. There are review articles on building LCA (see Table 1) but none focuses on the challenges of building LCA, ongoing studies and potential solutions to address the challenges. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-to-date systematic review of life cycle assessment of buildings, and to discuss the major challenges in building LCA, ongoing studies and potential solutions to resolve the identified issues. The methodology involves a detailed literature review to provide an overview of existing studies in building LCA, and a systematic selection and study of review articles/books to investigate the benefits and challenges of building LCA. A summary of the research outputs and recommended further studies on building LCA are outlined in the conclusion section. The major challenges in building LCA were identified as data intensity and quality, subjectivity in environmental impact characterization and valuation, inadequate definition of functional units, assumptions for building life span and service life, lack of procedure for system boundaries, lack of uncertainty analysis, and limitation as a decision-making tool. In addition to discussing ongoing studies to address the issues, this study also proposes research trajectories to resolve the major challenges identified in building LCA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent developments in life cycle assessment
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,444
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 · Cited by 1,455
Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview
Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007 · Cited by 1,408
Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework
(2013) · doi:10.3403/30151316 · Cited by 1,401
Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice
(2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3 · Cited by 1,073
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Chau, C. K., Leung, T. M., & Ng, W. Y. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023 · Cited by 945
Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review
Khasreen, M. M., Banfill, P. F. G., & Menzies, G. F. (2009) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su1030674 · Cited by 787
Considering Time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and Its Application to Global Warming Impact Assessments
Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., Deschênes, L., & Samson, R. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9030003 · Cited by 731
Scheuer, C., Keoleian, G. A., & Reppe, P. (2003) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/s0378-7788(03)00066-5 · Cited by 728
Metadata
- Authors
- Nwodo, M. N., & Anumba, C. J.
- Venue
- Building and Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 162
- Pages
- 106290
- ISSN
- 0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963186486
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 98
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106290
- The paper
- Nwodo, M. N., & Anumba, C. J. (2019). A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.