Cited by 68Environmental Impact and SustainabilityIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization

LCA and scenario analysis of a Norwegian net-zero GHG emission neighbourhood: The importance of mobility and surplus energy from PV technologies

Open access
Lausselet, C., Lund, K.M., Brattebø, H.·2021·Building and Environment

Abstract

The Zero Emission Neighbourhood (ZEN) concept gives a unique chance to assess the nexus of buildings, mobility, and energy systems to limit global warming and mitigate climate change. ZENs rely on the use of passive-house technologies in combination with local renewable-energy production such as by photo-voltaic (PV) systems to meet the internal energy demand and for export of surplus energy to the external power grid. We developed a modular LCA model that includes five physical elements: buildings, mobility, infrastructure, networks, and on-site energy. The model is applied on Ydalir, an ambitious ZEN in the early planning phases in Norway. Several scenarios were created to explore alternative mobility patterns and an upscaling of electricity production. The results show mobility to be the major source of greenhouse-gas emissions, with 62% of the total emissions in a baseline scenario. To reduce the travel distance of the inhabitants, measures such as car-sharing or greater use of public transports are highlighted as the best options to improve the climate performance of Ydalir. An upscaling of the electricity production from PV panels would allow for significantly reduced system-wide emissions if more surplus electricity is exported and can substitute power generated from fossil fuels or replace fossil fuels used in mobility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107528

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lausselet, C., Lund, K. M., & Brattebø, H.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Lausselet, C.
Venue
Building and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
189
Pages
107528
ISSN
0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111433111
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Building and Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Keywords
zero emission neighbourhoods, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment, mobility, energy exports, passive house, car sharing, public transport, scenario analysis, local renewable energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review