Cited by 110Infection Control and VentilationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Insufficient ventilation led to a probable long-range airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on two buses

Open access
Ou, Cuiyun, Hu, Shixiong, Luo, Kaiwei, Yang, Hongyu, Hang, Jian, Cheng, Pan, Hai, Zheng, Xiao, Shanliang +10 more·2022·Building and Environment

Abstract

Uncertainty remains on the threshold of ventilation rate in airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We analyzed a COVID-19 outbreak in January 2020 in Hunan Province, China, involving an infected 24-year-old man, Mr. X, taking two subsequent buses, B1 and B2, in the same afternoon. We investigated the possibility of airborne transmission and the ventilation conditions for its occurrence. The ventilation rates on the buses were measured using a tracer-concentration decay method with the original driver on the original route. We measured and calculated the spread of the exhaled virus-laden droplet tracer from the suspected index case. Ten additional passengers were found to be infected, with seven of them (including one asymptomatic) on B1 and two on B2 when Mr. X was present, and one passenger infected on the subsequent B1 trip. B1 and B2 had time-averaged ventilation rates of approximately 1.7 and 3.2 L/s per person, respectively. The difference in ventilation rates and exposure time could explain why B1 had a higher attack rate than B2. Airborne transmission due to poor ventilation below 3.2 L/s played a role in this two-bus outbreak of COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108414

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 110

Authors
Ou, C., Hu, S., Luo, K., Yang, H., Hang, J., Cheng, P., Hai, Z., Xiao, S., Qian, H., Xiao, S., Jing, X., Xie, Z., Ling, H., Liu, L., Gao, L., Deng, Q., Cowling, B. J., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Yuguo
Venue
Building and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
207
Pages
108414
ISSN
0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202287199
Cited by
110
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 4
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Building and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, airborne transmission, ventilation rate, COVID-19 outbreak, buses, exhaled droplets, attack rate, asymptomatic infection, indoor air quality, public transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review