Insufficient ventilation led to a probable long-range airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on two buses
Open accessAbstract
Uncertainty remains on the threshold of ventilation rate in airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We analyzed a COVID-19 outbreak in January 2020 in Hunan Province, China, involving an infected 24-year-old man, Mr. X, taking two subsequent buses, B1 and B2, in the same afternoon. We investigated the possibility of airborne transmission and the ventilation conditions for its occurrence. The ventilation rates on the buses were measured using a tracer-concentration decay method with the original driver on the original route. We measured and calculated the spread of the exhaled virus-laden droplet tracer from the suspected index case. Ten additional passengers were found to be infected, with seven of them (including one asymptomatic) on B1 and two on B2 when Mr. X was present, and one passenger infected on the subsequent B1 trip. B1 and B2 had time-averaged ventilation rates of approximately 1.7 and 3.2 L/s per person, respectively. The difference in ventilation rates and exposure time could explain why B1 had a higher attack rate than B2. Airborne transmission due to poor ventilation below 3.2 L/s played a role in this two-bus outbreak of COVID-19.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Ou, C., Hu, S., Luo, K., Yang, H., Hang, J., Cheng, P., Hai, Z., Xiao, S., Qian, H., Xiao, S., Jing, X., Xie, Z., Ling, H., Liu, L., Gao, L., Deng, Q., Cowling, B. J., & Li, Y.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Southeast University (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Central South University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Yuguo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Building and Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 207
- Pages
- 108414
- ISSN
- 0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8487323
- OpenAlex
- W3202287199
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Building and Environment (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, airborne transmission, ventilation rate, COVID-19 outbreak, buses, exhaled droplets, attack rate, asymptomatic infection, indoor air quality, public transport
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review