CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The inevitability of physician burnout: Implications for interventions.

Open access
Montgomery, Anthony·2014·Burnout Research
DOI 10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

For physicians, burnout is the inevitable consequence of the way that medical education is organised and the subsequent maladaptive behaviours that are reinforced in healthcare organisations via the hidden curriculum. Thus, burnout is an important indicator of how the organisation itself is functioning. A central theme in this paper will be the degree to which the organisational systems are responsible for the disconnect between performance and physician health. Healthcare pays considerable ‘lip-service’ to systems approaches, but in practice it valorises the role of the individual physician in terms of both success and failure. Thus, this contradiction needs to be addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.002

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dyrbye, 2010, Relationship between burnout and professional conduct and attitudes among US medical students, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304, 1171, 10.1001/jama.2010.1318 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Robert House, 1995, The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior, Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 71
  3. Tilburt, 2013, VIews of us physicians about controlling health care costs, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 310, 380, 10.1001/jama.2013.8278 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Montgomery, A.
Affiliations
University of Macedonia (GR)
Corresponding author
Montgomery, Anthony
ORCID
Montgomery, Anthony
Venue
Burnout Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
50-56
ISSN
  • 2213-0578 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-0586
DOI
10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.002
OpenAlex
W2090826807
Cited by
124
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Burnout Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
physician burnout, medical education, hidden curriculum, health care organization, organizational systems, maladaptive behavior, physician health, burnout intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review