Cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) in burn treatment: Three decades later
Abstract
Methods for handling burn wounds have changed in recent decades and increasingly aggressive surgical approach with early tangential excision and wound closure is being applied. Split-thickness skin (STSG) autografts are the "gold standard" for burn wound closure and remain the mainstay of treatment to provide permanent wound coverage and achieve healing. In some massively burned patients, however, the burns are so extensive that donor site availability is limited. Fortunately, considerable progress has been made in the culture of human keratinocytes and it is now possible to obtain large amounts of cultured epithelium from a small skin biopsy within 3-4 weeks. Questions related to optimal cell type for culture, culture techniques, transplantation of confluent sheets or non-confluent cells, immediate and late final take, carrier and transfer modality, as well as final outcome, ability to generate an epithelium after transplantation, and scar quality are still not fully answered. Progress accomplished since Reinwald and Green first described their keratinocyte culture technique is reviewed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cultured epithelial autografts demonstrate poor infection tolerance due to inferior vascular perfusion, as they only close the epidermal barrier.
“Additionally, cultured epithelial autografts demonstrate poor infection tolerance due to inferior vascular perfusion, as they only close the epidermal barrier.[ 56 , 57 ]”
From Coordinated Development of Immune Cell Populations in Vascularized Skin Organoids from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 327
- Authors
- Atiyeh, B. S., & Costagliola, M.
- Affiliations
- American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB)
- Université de Toulouse (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Atiyeh, Bishara S.
- ORCID
- Atiyeh, Bishara S.
- Venue
- Burns
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 405-413
- ISSN
- 0305-4179 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164379398
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Burns (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Keywords
- cultured epithelial autografts, burn wound closure, keratinocyte culture, split-thickness skin graft, massive burns, donor site limitation, graft take, keratinocyte transplantation, history of burn treatment
- MeSH terms
- Burns, Cells, Cultured, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Transplantation, Autologous, Keratinocytes, Skin Transplantation, Tissue Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review