Cited by 327Burn Injury Management and OutcomesWound Healing and TreatmentsDermatologic Treatments and Research

Cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) in burn treatment: Three decades later

Atiyeh, Bishara S., Costagliola, Michel·2007·Burns

Abstract

Methods for handling burn wounds have changed in recent decades and increasingly aggressive surgical approach with early tangential excision and wound closure is being applied. Split-thickness skin (STSG) autografts are the "gold standard" for burn wound closure and remain the mainstay of treatment to provide permanent wound coverage and achieve healing. In some massively burned patients, however, the burns are so extensive that donor site availability is limited. Fortunately, considerable progress has been made in the culture of human keratinocytes and it is now possible to obtain large amounts of cultured epithelium from a small skin biopsy within 3-4 weeks. Questions related to optimal cell type for culture, culture techniques, transplantation of confluent sheets or non-confluent cells, immediate and late final take, carrier and transfer modality, as well as final outcome, ability to generate an epithelium after transplantation, and scar quality are still not fully answered. Progress accomplished since Reinwald and Green first described their keratinocyte culture technique is reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.burns.2006.11.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 327

Authors
Atiyeh, B. S., & Costagliola, M.
Affiliations
  • American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB)
  • Université de Toulouse (FR)
Corresponding author
Atiyeh, Bishara S.
Venue
Burns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
405-413
ISSN
0305-4179 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164379398
Cited by
327
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Burns (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
cultured epithelial autografts, burn wound closure, keratinocyte culture, split-thickness skin graft, massive burns, donor site limitation, graft take, keratinocyte transplantation, history of burn treatment
MeSH terms
Burns, Cells, Cultured, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Transplantation, Autologous, Keratinocytes, Skin Transplantation, Tissue Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review