CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The concurrent use of probiotic microorganism and collagen hydrogel/scaffold enhances burn wound healing: An in vivo evaluation

Oryan, Ahmad, Jalili, Maryam, Kamali, Amir, Nikahval, Behrooz·2018·Burns
DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.016

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Peck, 2009, A global plan for burn prevention and care, Bull World Health Organ, 87, 802, 10.2471/BLT.08.059733 · DOI
  2. Cumming, 2001, Objective estimates of the incidence and consequences of multiple organ dysfunction and sepsis after burn trauma, J Trauma, 50, 510, 10.1097/00005373-200103000-00016 · DOI
  3. Hettiaratchy, 2004, ABC of burns: pathophysiology and types of burns, BMJ, 328, 1427, 10.1136/bmj.328.7453.1427 · DOI
  4. Oryan, 2017, Burn wound healing: present concepts, treatment strategies and future directions, J Wound Care, 26, 5, 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.5 · DOI
  5. Church, 2006, Burn wound infections, Clin Microbiol Rev, 19, 403, 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006 · DOI
  6. Tiwari, 2012, Burn wound. How it differs from other wounds?, Indian J Plast Surg, 45, 364, 10.4103/0970-0358.101319 · DOI
  7. Zarghooni, 2015, Is the use of modern versus conventional wound dressings warranted after primary knee and hip arthroplasty? Results of a Prospective Comparative Study, Acta Orthop Belg, 81, 768
  8. Heyer, 2013, Effectiveness of advanced versus conventional wound dressings on healing of chronic wounds: systematic review and meta-analysis, Dermatology, 226, 172, 10.1159/000348331 · DOI
  9. Dhivya, 2015, Wound dressings—a review, BioMedicine, 5, 10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9 · DOI
  10. Elliott, 2010, The effects of silver dressings on chronic and burns wound healing, Br J Nurs, 19, S32, 10.12968/bjon.2010.19.Sup5.77707 · DOI
  11. Sood, 2014, Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data, Adv Wound Care, 3, 511, 10.1089/wound.2012.0401 · DOI
  12. Rahimnejad, 2017, Biomaterials and tissue engineering for scar management in wound care, Burns Trauma, 5, 10.1186/s41038-017-0069-9 · DOI
  13. Singh, 2011, Collagen dressing versus conventional dressings in burn and chronic wounds: a retrospective study, J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 4, 12, 10.4103/0974-2077.79180 · DOI
  14. Mathangi Ramakrishnan, 2013, Advantages of collagen based biological dressings in the management of superficial and superficial partial thickness burns in children, Ann Burns Fire Disasters, 26, 98
  15. Brett, 2008, A review of collagen and collagen-based wound dressings, Wounds, 20, 347
  16. Oryan, 2016, Biological properties and therapeutic activities of honey in wound healing: a narrative review and meta-analysis, J Tissue Viability, 25, 98, 10.1016/j.jtv.2015.12.002 · DOI
  17. Oryan, 1998, Effects of topical application of honey on cutaneous wound healing in rabbits, Zentralbl Veterinarmed A, 45, 181, 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1998.tb00815.x · DOI
  18. Oryan, 2016, Topical application of Aloe vera accelerated wound healing, modeling, and remodeling: an experimental study, Ann Plast Surg, 77, 37, 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000239 · DOI
  19. Oryan, 2015, Avocado/soybean unsaponifiables: a novel regulator of cutaneous wound healing, modelling and remodelling, Int Wound J, 12, 674, 10.1111/iwj.12196 · DOI
  20. Argenta, 2016, Local application of probiotic bacteria prophylaxes against sepsis and death resulting from burn wound infection, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0165294 · DOI
  21. Peral, 2009, Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus plantarum in burns, Int Wound J, 6, 73, 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00577.x · DOI
  22. Ramos, 2015, Compounds from Lactobacillus plantarum culture supernatants with potential pro-healing and anti-pathogenic properties in skin chronic wounds, Pharm Biol, 53, 350, 10.3109/13880209.2014.920037 · DOI
  23. Medeiros, 2012, Effects of purified Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1→3)-β-glucan on venous ulcer healing, Int J Mol Sci, 13, 8142, 10.3390/ijms13078142 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Techatanawat, 2011, Type I collagen extracted from rat-tail and bovine Achilles tendon for dental application: a comparative study, Asian Biomed, 787
  25. Yates, 2007, Delayed and deficient dermal maturation in mice lacking the CXCR3 ELR-negative CXC chemokine receptor, Am J Pathol, 171, 484, 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061092 · DOI
  26. Oryan, 2007, Effects of 4-chloro-2,6-bis-(2-hydroxyl-benzyl)-phenol on healing of skin wounds and growth of bacteria, J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med, 54, 585, 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.00984.x · DOI
  27. Jiang, 2017, Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis, BMJ Open, 7, 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013289 · DOI
  28. Kosen, 2012, Application of collagen hydrogel/sponge scaffold facilitates periodontal wound healing in class II furcation defects in beagle dogs, J Periodontal Res, 47, 626, 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01475.x · DOI
  29. Chattopadhyay, 2014, Collagen-based biomaterials for wound healing, Biopolymers, 101, 821, 10.1002/bip.22486 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Carlson, 2004, The fibroblast-populated collagen matrix as a model of wound healing: a review of the evidence, Wound Repair Regen, 12, 134, 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012208.x · DOI
  31. Parenteau-Bareil, 2010, Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications, Materials, 3, 1863, 10.3390/ma3031863 · DOI
  32. Docherty, 1989, Glycosaminoglycans facilitate the movement of fibroblasts through three-dimensional collagen matrices, J Cell Sci, 92, 263, 10.1242/jcs.92.2.263 · DOI
  33. Huseini, 2012, Evaluation of wound healing activities of kefir products, Burns, 38, 719, 10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.005 · DOI
  34. Valdéz, 2005, Interference of Lactobacillus plantarum with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in infected burns: the potential use of probiotics in wound treatment, Clin Microbiol Infect, 11, 472, 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01142.x · DOI
  35. Partlow, 2016, Effect of topically applied Saccharomyces boulardii on the healing of acute porcine wounds: a preliminary study, BMC Res Notes, 9, 210, 10.1186/s13104-016-2012-8 · DOI
  36. López-Martínez, 2012, The STF2p hydrophilin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for dehydration stress tolerance, PLoS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0033324 · DOI
  37. Tsiouris, 2017, Human microflora, probiotics and wound healing, Wound Med, 19, 33, 10.1016/j.wndm.2017.09.006 · DOI
  38. Lima, 2017, Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Brazilian kefir-fermented milk: an in vitro evaluation of probiotic properties, Microb Pathog, 110, 670, 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.05.010 · DOI
  39. Lew, 2013, Bioactives from probiotics for dermal health: functions and benefits, J Appl Microbiol, 114, 1241, 10.1111/jam.12137 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Oryan, A., Jalili, M., Kamali, A., & Nikahval, B.
Venue
Burns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
1775-1786
ISSN
0305-4179
DOI
10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.016
Cited by
89
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Veterinary School, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
  • Iran National Science FoundationIran National Science Foundation (INSF) (96006039)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review