Cited by 82Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsWound Healing and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Skin wound repair: Results of a pre-clinical study to evaluate electropsun collagen–elastin–PCL scaffolds as dermal substitutes

Chong, Cassandra, Wang, Yiwei, Fathi, Ali, Parungao, Roxanne, Maitz, Peter K., Li, Zhe·2019·Burns

Abstract

The gold standard treatment for severe burn injuries is autologous skin grafting and the use of commercial dermal substitutes. However, resulting skin tissue following treatment usually displays abnormal morphology and functionality including scarring, skin contracture due to the poor elasticity and strength of existing dermal substitutes. In this study, we have developed a triple-polymer scaffold made of collagen-elastin-polycaprolactone (CEP) composite, aiming to enhance the mechanical properties of the scaffold while retaining its biological properties in promoting cell attachment, proliferation and tissue regeneration. The inclusion of elastin was revealed to decrease the stiffness of the scaffold, while also decreasing hysteresis and increasing elasticity. In mice, electrospun collagen-elastin-PCL scaffolds promoted keratinocyte and fibroblast proliferation, tissue integration and accelerated early-stage angiogenesis. Only a mild inflammatory response was observed in the first 2 weeks post-subcutaneous implantation. Our data indicates that the electrospun collagen-elastin-PCL scaffolds could potentially serve as a skin substitute to promote skin cell growth and tissue regeneration after severe burn injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chong, C., Wang, Y., Fathi, A., Parungao, R., Maitz, P. K., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Li, Zhe
Venue
Burns
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
1639-1648
ISSN
0305-4179 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944524137
Cited by
82
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Burns (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
skin substitutes, electrospun scaffolds, burn wound healing, skin tissue engineering, keratinocyte proliferation, fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, scaffold mechanical properties, inflammation, subcutaneous implantation
MeSH terms
Animals, Collagen, Elastin, Fibroblasts, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Skin, Wound Healing, Keratinocytes, Skin, Artificial, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Collagen Type I, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review