Skin wound repair: Results of a pre-clinical study to evaluate electropsun collagen–elastin–PCL scaffolds as dermal substitutes
Abstract
The gold standard treatment for severe burn injuries is autologous skin grafting and the use of commercial dermal substitutes. However, resulting skin tissue following treatment usually displays abnormal morphology and functionality including scarring, skin contracture due to the poor elasticity and strength of existing dermal substitutes. In this study, we have developed a triple-polymer scaffold made of collagen-elastin-polycaprolactone (CEP) composite, aiming to enhance the mechanical properties of the scaffold while retaining its biological properties in promoting cell attachment, proliferation and tissue regeneration. The inclusion of elastin was revealed to decrease the stiffness of the scaffold, while also decreasing hysteresis and increasing elasticity. In mice, electrospun collagen-elastin-PCL scaffolds promoted keratinocyte and fibroblast proliferation, tissue integration and accelerated early-stage angiogenesis. Only a mild inflammatory response was observed in the first 2 weeks post-subcutaneous implantation. Our data indicates that the electrospun collagen-elastin-PCL scaffolds could potentially serve as a skin substitute to promote skin cell growth and tissue regeneration after severe burn injury.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PCL/collagen blend is a promising material for skin and vascular TE.
“PCL/collagen blend is a promising material for skin [153,154,155,156,157,158] and vascular TE [159,160,161].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [156]
Cites
Human macrophage-mediated biodegradation of polyurethanes: assessment of candidate enzyme activities
Labow, R. S., Meek, E., Matheson, L. A., & Santerre, J. P. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00137-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chong, C., Wang, Y., Fathi, A., Parungao, R., Maitz, P. K., & Li, Z.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Zhe
- Venue
- Burns
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1639-1648
- ISSN
- 0305-4179 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944524137
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Burns (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- skin substitutes, electrospun scaffolds, burn wound healing, skin tissue engineering, keratinocyte proliferation, fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, scaffold mechanical properties, inflammation, subcutaneous implantation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Collagen, Elastin, Fibroblasts, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Skin, Wound Healing, Keratinocytes, Skin, Artificial, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Collagen Type I, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review