The AI intelligence playbook: Decoding GenAI capabilities for strategic advantage
Open accessAbstract
The rapid adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) across industries has created new opportunities for efficiency, creativity, and innovation. At the same time, it has introduced confusion about what GenAI is capable of, how it should be used, and where it fits within existing business structures. While GenAI is often treated as a singular capability, we argue that it is better understood as a collection of distinct intelligences that vary in maturity and application. Drawing from Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences theory, this paper introduces a taxonomy of GenAI intelligences and maps how they relate to current and emerging use cases. Leveraging this taxonomy, we then offer practical guidance to help businesses identify where GenAI can provide value today and where it remains limited. We propose that companies adopt an intelligence management approach that treats GenAI not as a generic tool but as a dynamic and evolving collaborator. By understanding the specific capabilities of different AI intelligences, business leaders can align GenAI adoption with strategic goals, communicate its role more clearly, and build long-term competitive advantage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The unit of strategy is no longer the individual consumer but is becoming the system that stands between the consumer and the firm.
“The unit of strategy is no longer the individual consumer but is becoming the system that stands between the consumer and the firm (Campbell et al., 2025).”
From Marketing to the Machine: Rethinking Global Marketing for the AI Era (2026) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2025
Firms might require new roles such as a Chief Algorithm Officer, cross-functional teams dedicated to platform relations, or governance structures centered on model-centric markets.
“Firms might require new roles such as a Chief Algorithm Officer, cross-functional teams dedicated to platform relations, or governance structures centered on model-centric markets (Campbell et al., 2025).”
From Marketing to the Machine: Rethinking Global Marketing for the AI Era (2026) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2025
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 48 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Campbell, C., Sands, S., Whittaker, L., & Mavrommatis, A.
- Affiliations
- University of San Diego (US)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Esade (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Campbell, Colin
- Venue
- Business Horizons
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-07
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 557-574
- ISSN
- 0007-6813 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413798331
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Business Horizons (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- generative AI, multiple intelligences, AI maturity, AI adoption strategy, intelligence management, competitive advantage, AI as collaborator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review