Cited by 69Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

CHAT-ACTS: A pedagogical framework for personalized chatbot to enhance active learning and self-regulated learning

Open access
Lin, Michael Pin-Chuan, Chang, Daniel·2023·Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The CHAT-ACTS pedagogical framework presented in this paper integrates personalized chatbots into active and self-regulated learning (SRL) to enhance student engagement, motivation, and learning outcomes. Employing three primary learning modes - Personalized Chatbot, Self-Regulated Learning, and Active Learning - the learner occupies the central position, symbolizing their active role in shaping their learning journey. Strategic actions such as Evaluation, Feedback, and Plan are crucial in the Personalized Chatbot mode, while the SRL mode emphasizes Goal Setting and Study Tactics. The Active Learning mode underscores Active-Based Learning and Teaching Strategies. Through these modes, bidirectional relationships are established, facilitating feedback, setting goals, and employing active learning techniques. By utilizing this framework, educators can maximize the impact of personalized chatbots in various educational settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100167

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advances in generative AI, particularly large language models, offer significant promise for personalised scaffolding by overcoming limitations of traditional rule-based approaches.

    “Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, offer significant promise for personalised scaffolding by overcoming the limitations of traditional rule-based approaches (Rudolph et al., 2023; Lin and Chang, 2023; Li et al., 2025).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 69

Authors
Lin, M. P.-C., & Chang, D.
Affiliations
  • Mount Saint Vincent University (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lin, Michael Pin-Chuan
Venue
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
Volume
5
Pages
100167
ISSN
2666-920X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386811596
Cited by
69
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 13
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
SSHRC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
personalized chatbots, pedagogical framework, active learning, student self-regulation, student engagement, student motivation, learning outcomes, goal setting, feedback, teaching methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review