Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students' performance in education
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the impact of activity-based learning and the utilization of ChatGPT on students' academic performance within the educational framework. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of activity-based learning in comparison to traditional methods, while also evaluating the potential benefits and drawbacks of integrating ChatGPT as an educational tool. The study employs a comparative approach, analyzing the outcomes of students exposed to activity-based learning versus those using conventional methods. Additionally, the study examines the usage of ChatGPT in education through surveys and trials to determine its contribution to personalized feedback, interactive learning, and innovative teaching methods. The findings reveal that activity-based learning enhances students' engagement, motivation, and critical thinking skills. Students participating in activity-based learning demonstrate improved academic achievement, which is attributed to their active involvement and practical application of knowledge. Similarly, the integration of ChatGPT offers novel avenues for interactive learning and individualized assistance, fostering students' understanding and exploration of complex concepts. In conclusion, activity-based learning proves to be a student-centered approach that enhances learning outcomes by fostering active participation and practical engagement. The utilization of ChatGPT in education showcases its potential to enhance educational experiences through…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 113 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Al Shloul, T., Mazhar, T., Abbas, Q., Iqbal, M., Ghadi, Y. Y., Shahzad, T., Mallek, F., & Hamam, H.
- Affiliations
- Virtual University of Pakistan (PK)
- International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK)
- Gomal University (PK)
- Al Ain University (AE)
- COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
- Université de Moncton (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mazhar, Tehseen
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 100219
- ISSN
- 2666-920X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4393902165
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 43
- FWCI
- 65.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- activity-based learning, ChatGPT, large language models in education, academic performance, student engagement, student motivation, critical thinking, personalized feedback, interactive learning, student-centered learning, conventional instruction comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review