Cited by 173Artificial Intelligence in EducationInnovative Teaching MethodsProblem and Project Based Learning

Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students' performance in education

Open access
Al Shloul, Tamara, Mazhar, Tehseen, Abbas, Qamar, Iqbal, Muhammad, Ghadi, Yazeed Yasin, Shahzad, Tariq, Mallek, Fatma, Hamam, Habib·2024·Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of activity-based learning and the utilization of ChatGPT on students' academic performance within the educational framework. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of activity-based learning in comparison to traditional methods, while also evaluating the potential benefits and drawbacks of integrating ChatGPT as an educational tool. The study employs a comparative approach, analyzing the outcomes of students exposed to activity-based learning versus those using conventional methods. Additionally, the study examines the usage of ChatGPT in education through surveys and trials to determine its contribution to personalized feedback, interactive learning, and innovative teaching methods. The findings reveal that activity-based learning enhances students' engagement, motivation, and critical thinking skills. Students participating in activity-based learning demonstrate improved academic achievement, which is attributed to their active involvement and practical application of knowledge. Similarly, the integration of ChatGPT offers novel avenues for interactive learning and individualized assistance, fostering students' understanding and exploration of complex concepts. In conclusion, activity-based learning proves to be a student-centered approach that enhances learning outcomes by fostering active participation and practical engagement. The utilization of ChatGPT in education showcases its potential to enhance educational experiences through…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 113 · Cited by 173

Authors
Al Shloul, T., Mazhar, T., Abbas, Q., Iqbal, M., Ghadi, Y. Y., Shahzad, T., Mallek, F., & Hamam, H.
Affiliations
  • Virtual University of Pakistan (PK)
  • International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK)
  • Gomal University (PK)
  • Al Ain University (AE)
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Université de Moncton (CA)
Corresponding author
Mazhar, Tehseen
Venue
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
6
Pages
100219
ISSN
2666-920X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393902165
Cited by
173
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 43
FWCI
65.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
activity-based learning, ChatGPT, large language models in education, academic performance, student engagement, student motivation, critical thinking, personalized feedback, interactive learning, student-centered learning, conventional instruction comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review