Enhancing artificial intelligence literacy through cross-cultural online workshops
Open accessAbstract
This article presents the results of a study conducted in collaboration with two universities – one in Lapland (Finland) and the other in Hong Kong (China) – during the development of an international university course on global media education. The objective of the study was to examine international students’ changing conceptual understanding of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy as part of the course. The need for this study arose from the recent rapid spread of AI across industries, which has connected human learning to machine learning. This requires competence in AI to contribute to future society. Five hours of online lectures on AI literacy were delivered during two workshops to students (N = 29) from 13 countries with no or limited prior knowledge of the subject in 2021 and 2022. The participants filled out pre- and post-workshop quantitative questionnaires and wrote diaries about their learning process, the development of their understanding of AI-literacy concepts, and their thoughts on the pedagogical approaches used. The quantitative data were analysed using a paired-samples t test, while the qualitative data were examined using thematic-content analysis. The findings show that the students’ knowledge of AI and their awareness of the importance of AI literacy and media education increased significantly. Further research is needed so that a more appropriate curriculum can be designed for them. We outline some key activities that offer interactive and participatory ways to learn AI in order to assist educators in planning and delivering AI-literacy courses as part of cross-cultural media education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Offering such a course to pre-service teachers in Faculties of Education contributes significantly to the conscious and effective use of AI technologies in both their current academic and future professional lives.
“Offering such a course to pre-service teachers in Faculties of Education contributes significantly to the conscious and effective use of AI technologies in both their current academic and future professional lives (Korte et al., 2024; Laru et al., 2024).”
From Integrating artificial intelligence into preservice teacher education: enhancing AI literacy and digital material design competency (2026) · cites this paper as Korte et al., 2024
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Korte, S.-M., Cheung, W. M.-Y., Maasilta, M., Kong, S.-C., Keskitalo, P., Wang, L., Lau, C. M., Lee, J. C. K., & Gu, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Lapland (FI)
- Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers and Education Open
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 100164
- ISSN
- 2666-5573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391131805
- Semantic Scholar
- 450012b25e4a49fc6a18a466cb051aa7e794dacc
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 18.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers and Education Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- LaCRIS (University of Lapland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Li Ka Shing Foundation
- Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (EdUHK CB302)
- Education University of Hong Kong
- Lapin Yliopisto
- Opetushallitus
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
- Keywords
- AI literacy, intercultural education, online workshops, international students, AI literacy curriculum, participatory learning, artificial intelligence in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review