The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segmentation of digital rock images using deep convolutional autoencoder networks
Abstract
Abstract Segmentation is a critical step in Digital Rock Physics (DRP) as the original images are available in a gray-scale format. Conventional methods often use thresholding to delineate distinct phases and, consequently, watershed algorithm to identify the existing phases. Such methods are based on color contrast, which makes it difficult to automatically differentiate phases with similar colors and intensities. Recently, deep learning and machine learning algorithms have proposed several algorithms working with images, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Among them, convolutional autoencoder networks have produced accurate results in different applications when various images are available for the training. In this paper, thus, convolutional autoencoder algorithm is implemented to enhance segmentation of digital rock images. However, the bottleneck for applying the CNN algorithms in DRP is the limited available rock images. As an effective data augmentation method, a cross-correlation based simulation was used to increase the necessary dataset in this study. Therefore, using the originally available dataset, namely 20 images from Berea sandstone, a training seed comprising of the manually and semi-manually segmented images was used. Then, the dataset is divided into training, validation and testing groups with a fraction of 80, 10 and 10%, respectively. Next, the produced dataset is given to our stochastic image generator algorithm and 20000 realizations, along with their segmented images, are produced simultaneously. The implemented CNN algorithm was tested for two versions of basic and extended architectures. The results show that the extended network produces results with 96% of categorical accuracy using the designated images in the testing group. Finally, a qualitative comparison with the conventional multiphase segmentation (multi-thresholding) revealed that our results are more accurate and reliable even if very few rock images are available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
Haykin, S. (1998) · Cited by 30,070
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 · Cited by 19,631
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
(1995) · Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1995.466933 · Cited by 12,860
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Shelhamer, E., Long, J., & Darrell, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2572683 · Cited by 11,898
Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation
Sankur, B. (2004) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.1631315 · Cited by 4,583
Metadata
- Authors
- Karimpouli, S., & Tahmasebi, P.
- Venue
- Computers & Geosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 126
- Pages
- 142-150
- ISSN
- 0098-3004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911268982
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 21.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segmentation of digital rock images using deep convolutional autoencoder networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.02.003
- The paper
- Karimpouli, S., & Tahmasebi, P. (2019). Segmentation of digital rock images using deep convolutional autoencoder networks. Computers & Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.