Cited by 98Endometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Recent changes in endometrial cancer trends among menopausal-age US women.

Open access
Wartko, Paige, Sherman, Mark E., Yang, Hannah P., Felix, Ashley S., Brinton, Louise A., Trabert, Britton·2013·Cancer Epidemiology

Abstract

Background Changes in endometrial cancer incidence rates after the precipitous decline in menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use in 2002 have not been evaluated.Methods Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 1992 to 2009 (SEER 13), we identified 63428 incident endometrial cancer cases among women ages 20-74. We compared annual percent change (APC) in endometrial cancer incidence rates from 1992 to 2002 to rates from 2003 to 2009.Results In contrast to the constant endometrial cancer rate pattern observed from 1992 to 2002 (APC 0.0%), rates increased after 2002 in women 50-74 years old (2.5%; PAPC comparison<0.01). Endometrial cancer incidence increased over the entire time period among women ages 20-49 (1992-2002: 1.1%; 2003-2009: 2.1%; PAPC comparison=0.21). Post-2002 increases in incidence among women ages 50-74 were specific to Type I endometrial tumors (1992-2002: -0.6%; 2003-2009: 1.6%; PAPC comparison<0.01).Discussion The increase in endometrial cancer incidence rates after 2002 may be related to the widespread decrease in estrogen plus progestin MHT use, which has been reported to lower endometrial cancer risk in overweight and obese women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.canep.2013.03.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 98

Authors
Wartko, P., Sherman, M. E., Yang, H. P., Felix, A. S., Brinton, L. A., & Trabert, B.
Affiliations
National Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Trabert, Britton
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
374-377
ISSN
1877-7821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070921386
Cited by
98
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (Z01CP010126)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
endometrial cancer, incidence trends, hormone replacement therapy, estrogen plus progestin, postmenopausal women, obesity, overweight, cancer risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Humans, Menopause, Middle Aged, Obesity, Time Factors, United States, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Incidence, Endometrial Neoplasms, SEER Program, Overweight, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review