Lack of enhancing effects of sodium nitrite on 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b] pyridine (PhIP) induced mammary carcinogenesis in female Sprague–Dawley rats
Abstract
A number of heterocyclic amines (HCAs) have been shown to exert enhanced carcinogenic and mutagenic potential when given simultaneously with sodium nitrite (NaNO(2)). In the present experiment, effects of combined treatment with NaNO(2) and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), one of the most prevalent carcinogenic HCAs in the human environment, were assessed with regard to mammary tumor induction in female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Animals at 6 weeks of age were given intragastric doses of 100mg/kg body weight of PhIP twice a week for 4 weeks, during which period 0 or 0.2% NaNO(2) was administered in the drinking water. Control rats received 0.2% NaNO(2) alone for the 4 weeks or non-supplemented water during the entire 48 week experimental period, without carcinogen treatment. The first tumor in the PhIP+NaNO(2) group appeared significantly later than with PhIP alone, and during the experimental period, the incidence, multiplicity and volume of mammary tumors in this group tended towards decreased, although values did not significantly differ at the terminal sacrifice. These results indicate that NaNO(2) does not enhance PhIP-induced rat mammary carcinogenesis, rather possessing some potential for inhibition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sodium nitrite administration to tumor bearing mice does not significantly affect growth rates.
“Conversely, it has been reported that sodium nitrite administration to tumor bearing mice does not significantly affect growth rates and that nitrite can inhibit cell division of certain tumor cell lines [263, 277].”
From Inorganic nitrite therapy: historical perspective and future directions (2011) · cites this paper as [277]
Nitrite can inhibit cell division of certain tumor cell lines.
“Conversely, it has been reported that sodium nitrite administration to tumor bearing mice does not significantly affect growth rates and that nitrite can inhibit cell division of certain tumor cell lines [263, 277].”
From Inorganic nitrite therapy: historical perspective and future directions (2011) · cites this paper as [277]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Kitamura, Y., Yamagishi, M., Okazaki, K., Furukawa, F., Imazawa, T., Nishikawa, A., & Hirose, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Health Sciences (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Hirose, Masao
- ORCID
- Nishikawa, Akiyoshi
- Venue
- Cancer Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 235
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-74
- ISSN
- 0304-3835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011899918
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Keywords
- sodium nitrite, PhIP, heterocyclic amines, mammary carcinogenesis, mammary tumors, tumor suppression, carcinogen interaction, food carcinogens, female Sprague-Dawley rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Body Weight, Carcinogens, Drug Synergism, Female, Imidazoles, Indicators and Reagents, Sodium Nitrite, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Mammary Neoplasms, Animal, Incidence, Cell Death, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cell Proliferation, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review