Cited by 79Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesAutophagy in Disease and TherapyHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Co-targeting of EGFR and autophagy signaling is an emerging treatment strategy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Koustas, Evangelos, Karamouzis, Michalis V., Mihailidou, Chrysovalantou, Schizas, Dimitrios, Papavassiliou, Athanasios G.·2017·Cancer Letters

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its associated pathway is a critical key regulator of CRC development and progression. The monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) cetuximab and panitumumab, directed against EGFR, represent a major step forward in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival in several clinical trials. However, the activity of anti-EGFR MoAbs appears to be limited to a subset of patients with mCRC. Studies have highlighted that acquired-resistance to anti-EGFR MoAbs biochemically converge into Ras/Raf/Mek/Erk and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways. Recent data also suggest that acquired-resistance to anti-EGFR MoAbs is accompanied by inhibition of EGFR internalization, ubiqutinization, degradation and prolonged downregulation. It is well established that autophagy, a self-cannibalization process, is considered to be associated with resistance to the anti-EGFR MoAbs therapy. Additionally, autophagy induced by anti-EGFR MoAbs acts as a protective response in cancer cells. Thus, inhibition of autophagy after treatment with EGFR MoAbs can result in autophagic cell death. A combination therapy comprising of anti-EGFR MoAbs and autophagy inhibitors would represent a multi-pronged approach that could be evolved into an active therapeutic strategy in mCRC patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 79

Authors
Koustas, E., Karamouzis, M. V., Mihailidou, C., Schizas, D., & Papavassiliou, A. G.
Affiliations
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
  • Karamouzis, Michalis V.
  • Papavassiliou, Athanasios G.
Venue
Cancer Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
396
Pages
94-102
ISSN
0304-3835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2596429149
Cited by
79
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, EGFR, autophagy, cetuximab, panitumumab, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, acquired drug resistance, autophagy inhibitors, combination therapy, RAS/MAPK pathway, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, EGFR internalization, ubiquitination, autophagic cell death
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Autophagy, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Transfection, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Molecular Targeted Therapy, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review