Cited by 36Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsCancer Cells and Metastasis

Combinatorial screening using orthotopic patient derived xenograft-expanded early phase cultures of osteosarcoma identify novel therapeutic drug combinations

Open access
Loh, Amos H.P., Stewart, Elizabeth, Bradley, Cori L., Chen, Xiang, Daryani, Vinay, Stewart, Clinton F., Calabrese, Christopher, Funk, Amy +8 more·2019·Cancer Letters

Abstract

Lead discovery in osteosarcoma has been hampered by the lack of new agents, limited representative clinical samples and paucity of accurate preclinical models. We developed orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) that recapitulated the molecular, cellular and histologic features of primary tumors, and screened PDX-expanded short-term cultures and commercial cell lines of osteosarcoma against focused drug libraries. Osteosarcoma cells were most sensitive to HDAC, proteasome, and combination PI3K/MEK and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, and least sensitive to PARP, RAF, ERK and MEK inhibitors. Correspondingly, PI3K signaling pathway genes were up-regulated in metastatic tumors compared to primary tumors. In combinatorial screens, as a class, HDAC inhibitors showed additive effects when combined with standard-of-care agents gemcitabine and doxorubicin. This lead discovery strategy afforded a means to perform high-throughput drug screens of tumor cells that accurately recapitulated those from original human tumors, and identified classes of novel and repurposed drugs with activity against osteosarcoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.033

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PDX model systems are valuable in basic science and personalized medicine because they have clinical and molecular features representative of human disease.

    “These PDX model systems are of particular value in both basic science and potentially personalized medicine research 180,183,222 as they have clinical and molecular features that are quite representative of the human disease 223,224,225,226 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [183]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]Johanna Bendell PL, Kwak Eunice, Pandya Susan, Musib Luna, Jones Cheryl, De Crespigny Alex, Belvin Marcia, McKenzie Meghan, Gates Mary R., Chan Iris and Shapiro Geoffrey. in Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research Vol. 71 (AACR, Orlando, FL, 2011 Apr 2–6;).

Authors
Loh, A. H. P., Stewart, E., Bradley, C. L., Chen, X., Daryani, V., Stewart, C. F., Calabrese, C., Funk, A., Miller, G., Karlstrom, A., Krafcik, F., Goshorn, D. R., Vogel, P., Bahrami, A., Shelat, A., & Dyer, M. A.
Affiliations
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Dyer, Michael A.
Venue
Cancer Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
442
Pages
262-270
ISSN
0304-3835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898685440
Cited by
36
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Center (CA21765)
  • American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  • National Medical Research Council Singapore (008-185)
  • St. Baldrick’s Foundation and the National Pediatric Cancer Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (EY014867, EY018599, CA168875)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Alex Lemonade Stand
  • Tully Family and Peterson Foundations
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
osteosarcoma, patient-derived xenografts, orthotopic xenograft, combinatorial drug screening, drug repurposing, histone deacetylase inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, gemcitabine, doxorubicin, metastatic cancer, lead compound identification
MeSH terms
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Animals, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Bone Neoplasms, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Osteosarcoma, Mice, SCID, Mice, Inbred NOD, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Tumor Burden, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Drug Repositioning, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review