SHP2 inhibition mitigates adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS-mutant gastric cancer through the suppression of KSR1 activity
Abstract
Despite the promising antitumor activity of RAF/MEK inhibitors for RAS-driven cancers, not all patients respond to these therapies. Adaptive resistance has been reported as a major culprit in non-responders, which can be reversed by SHP2 inhibitors (SHP2is) in multiple cancer cells; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, we found that KRAS-mutant gastric cancer cells respond to MEK inhibitors (MEKis) with adaptive resistance. Markedly, SHP2 activation accompanied by ERK signaling restoration in MEKi-treated cells, and a MEKi and SHP2i combination had a synergistic effect on downstream signaling blockade. In vivo, SHP099 combined with AZD6244 (selumetinib) was highly efficacious for the treatment of xenografts. Mechanistically, SHP2 was found to interact with the scaffold protein KSR1 through its protein tyrosine phosphatase domain. KSR1 knockdown sensitized cells to AZD6244, whereas a KSR1 activating mutation (S269A) diminished the synergistic anti-proliferative effect of SHP2i and MEKi. Interestingly, activated SHP2, during adaptive resistance to MEKis, impaired the interaction with KSR1, activating KSR1 to promote MAPK signaling. In conclusion, SHP2 promotes adaptive resistance to MEKis by activating KSR1; selumetinib combined with SHP099 might be an available therapeutic strategy for KRAS-mutant gastric cancers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SHP2 inhibitors effectively overcome adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS mutant cancers.
“In addition, it has been shown that SHP2 inhibitors effectively overcome adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS mutant cancers [70,71].”
From RAS Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Novel Therapeutic Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Zheng, W., Yang, Z., Song, P., Sun, Y., Liu, P., Yue, L., Lv, K., Wang, X., Shen, Y., Si, J., Zhang, X., Ke, Y., Cheng, H., & Hu, W.
- Affiliations
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Hongqiang
- Hu, Weiling
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 555
- Pages
- 216029
- ISSN
- 0304-3835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311019662
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancer Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY23H160016)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070952, 81873418)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- SHP2, SHP099, MEK inhibitors, adaptive drug resistance, KSR1, ERK signaling, MAPK signaling, selumetinib, combination therapy, protein tyrosine phosphatase, RAS-driven cancers
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Mutation, Protein Kinases, Stomach Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review