Cited by 21Protein Tyrosine PhosphatasesMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

SHP2 inhibition mitigates adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS-mutant gastric cancer through the suppression of KSR1 activity

Zheng, Wenfang, Yang, Zhiyi, Song, Ping, Sun, Yingchao, Liu, Pan, Yue, Lei, Lv, Kaiqi, Wang, Xinjie +6 more·2023·Cancer Letters

Abstract

Despite the promising antitumor activity of RAF/MEK inhibitors for RAS-driven cancers, not all patients respond to these therapies. Adaptive resistance has been reported as a major culprit in non-responders, which can be reversed by SHP2 inhibitors (SHP2is) in multiple cancer cells; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, we found that KRAS-mutant gastric cancer cells respond to MEK inhibitors (MEKis) with adaptive resistance. Markedly, SHP2 activation accompanied by ERK signaling restoration in MEKi-treated cells, and a MEKi and SHP2i combination had a synergistic effect on downstream signaling blockade. In vivo, SHP099 combined with AZD6244 (selumetinib) was highly efficacious for the treatment of xenografts. Mechanistically, SHP2 was found to interact with the scaffold protein KSR1 through its protein tyrosine phosphatase domain. KSR1 knockdown sensitized cells to AZD6244, whereas a KSR1 activating mutation (S269A) diminished the synergistic anti-proliferative effect of SHP2i and MEKi. Interestingly, activated SHP2, during adaptive resistance to MEKis, impaired the interaction with KSR1, activating KSR1 to promote MAPK signaling. In conclusion, SHP2 promotes adaptive resistance to MEKis by activating KSR1; selumetinib combined with SHP099 might be an available therapeutic strategy for KRAS-mutant gastric cancers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.216029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 21

Authors
Zheng, W., Yang, Z., Song, P., Sun, Y., Liu, P., Yue, L., Lv, K., Wang, X., Shen, Y., Si, J., Zhang, X., Ke, Y., Cheng, H., & Hu, W.
Affiliations
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Cheng, Hongqiang
  • Hu, Weiling
Venue
Cancer Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
555
Pages
216029
ISSN
0304-3835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311019662
Cited by
21
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY23H160016)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070952, 81873418)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
SHP2, SHP099, MEK inhibitors, adaptive drug resistance, KSR1, ERK signaling, MAPK signaling, selumetinib, combination therapy, protein tyrosine phosphatase, RAS-driven cancers
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Protein Kinases, Stomach Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review