Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202Graphene research and applicationsElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The evolution of surface charge on graphene oxide during the reduction and its application in electroanalysis

Open access
Li, Ming-jie, Liu, Chen-ming, Xie, Yong-bing, Cao, Hong-bin, Zhao, He, Zhang, Yi·2014·Carbon

Abstract

A series of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) colloids with different amounts of surface charges was prepared. The change in surface charge at different pH values was detected by zeta potential measurement, and the evolution of oxygen-containing functional groups attached to the RGOs was analysed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy. Results showed that the edge phenolic hydroxyl and carboxyl groups made more contributions to the negative surface charge compared with the basal-plane hydroxyl and epoxy groups. Electrical impedance spectroscopy results proved that the surface charge of RGOs significantly affected their electrochemical properties. Furthermore, GO and RGOs (graphene oxide materials) were also used to construct electrochemical sensors for quantitive measurement of Cu2+ by differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry. The results revealed that the increase in negative surface charge on RGO enhanced its electrocatalytic activity for Cu2+ reduction. Thus, considering that studies on the properties of graphene oxide materials can be simplified by the surface charge, its analysis is an important means of material characterisation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.004

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Li, M.-J., Liu, C.-M., Xie, Y.-B., Cao, H.-B., Zhao, H., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Venue
Carbon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
66
Pages
302-311
ISSN
0008-6223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059350595
Cited by
202
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • cc-by-nc-sa
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Carbon (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Process Engineering, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51102238, 51108441)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
reduced graphene oxide, graphene oxide, surface charge, zeta potential, oxygen-containing functional groups, phenolic hydroxyl groups, carboxyl groups, electrochemical sensor, copper ion detection, anodic stripping voltammetry, electrocatalytic activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.