Cited by 38Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

Borate crosslinking synthesis of structure tailored carbon-based bifunctional electrocatalysts directly from guar gum hydrogels for efficient overall water splitting

Cheng, Yu, Pang, Kanglei, Xu, Xiaohui, Yuan, Pengfei, Zhang, Zhiguo, Wu, Xiao, Zheng, Lirong, Zhang, Jianan +1 more·2020·Carbon

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.024

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • B, N co-doped carbon nanosheets showed promising stability in all pH conditions.

    “The electrocatalyst also showed promising stability in all pH conditions.”

    From Aerogels for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

  • B, N co-doped carbon nanosheets showed HER η10 of 51.96 mV and a Tafel slope of 47 mV dec−1.

    “HER η10 and Tafel slope values of the electrocatalyst were 51.96 mV and 47 mV dec−1, respectively.”

    From Aerogels for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

  • B, N co-doped carbon nanosheets showed HER and OER onset potentials of 39.12 mV and 1.38 V, respectively, in 0.5 M H2SO4.

    “Specifically, the electrocatalyst showed HER and OER onset potentials of 39.12 mV and 1.38 V, respectively, in 0.5 M H2SO4.”

    From Aerogels for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

  • In 1 M KOH, B, N co-doped carbon nanosheets showed η10 of 52.34 mV and a Tafel slope of 43 mV dec−1.

    “In 1 M KOH, η10 and Tafel slope values of the electrocatalyst were found to be 52.34 mV and 43 mV dec−1, respectively.”

    From Aerogels for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, Y., Pang, K., Xu, X., Yuan, P., Zhang, Z., Wu, X., Zheng, L., Zhang, J., & Song, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yuan, Pengfei
  • Zhang, Jianan
  • Song, Rui
Venue
Carbon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
157
Pages
153-163
ISSN
0008-6223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981108972
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Carbon (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Keywords
borate crosslinking, guar gum hydrogel, carbon nanosheets, bifunctional electrocatalysts, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, overall water splitting, carbon aerogels, topological defects, proton adsorption, density functional theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review