Cited by 636

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Water-solubility of chitosan and its antimicrobial activity

QIN, C, LI, H, XIAO, Q, LIU, Y, ZHU, J, DU, Y·2006·Carbohydrate Polymers

Abstract

Chitosan samples with different molecular weights were prepared by depolymerization with hemicellusase, and water-soluble half N-acetylated chitosan samples were obtained by N-acetylation with acetic anhydride. The action of chitosans with molecular weights Mw from 1.4x10³ to 4.0x10⁵ on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans was explored by microcalorimetry. The water-soluble half N-acetylated chitosans and chitooligomers had no significant antimicrobial activity. Moreover, water-soluble chitosans and chitooligomers promoted the growth of C. albicans. In contrast, water-insoluble chitosan in acidic medium exhibited inhibitory effect against these microorganisms. The water-insoluble chitosans with Mw around 5x10⁴ were the optimum for antimicrobial action in these tested samples. The antimicrobial mechanism of dissolved water-insoluble chitosan was hypothesized as forming an impervious layer around the cell. The results suggest that optimum chitosan as food preservative should be water-insoluble chitosan from mild depolymerization of native chitosan.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.09.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
QIN, C., LI, H., XIAO, Q., LIU, Y., ZHU, J., & DU, Y.
Venue
Carbohydrate Polymers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03-03
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
367-374
ISSN
0144-8617
Cited by
636
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review