Cited by 63Biofuel production and bioconversionIonic liquids properties and applicationsCatalysis for Biomass Conversion

Mild pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of cellulose with recycled ionic liquids towards one-batch process

Auxenfans, Thomas, Buchoux, Sébastien, Djellab, Karim, Avondo, Carine, Husson, Eric, Sarazin, Catherine·2012·Carbohydrate Polymers

Abstract

The development of second-generation bioethanol involves minimizing the energy input throughout the processing steps. We report here that efficient ionic liquid pretreatments of cellulose can be achieved with short duration times (20 min) at mild temperature (45°C) with [Emim](+)[MeO(H)PO(2)](-) and at room temperature (25 °C) with [Emim](+)[CH(3)COO](-). In these conditions, yields of glucose were increased by a factor of 3. In addition, the recycling of these two imidazolium-based ILs can be performed in maintaining their efficiency to pretreat cellulose. The short time and mild temperature of cellulose solubilization allowed a one-batch processing of [Emim](+)[MeO(H)PO(2)](-) IL-pretreatment and saccharification. In the range from 0 to 100% IL in an aqueous enzymatic medium, the glucose yields were improved at IL proportions between 10 and 40%. The maximum yield at 10% IL is very promising to consider one batch process as efficient as two-step process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The energy input to grinding for corn stover conversion was estimated to be 1.1% of the energy content of corn stover (0.186 GJ of 17.0 GJ per tonne).

    “The energy input to grinding for corn stover conversion was estimated to be 1.1% of the energy content of corn stover (0.186 GJ of 17.0 GJ per tonne).185”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [185]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 63

Authors
Auxenfans, T., Buchoux, S., Djellab, K., Avondo, C., Husson, E., & Sarazin, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université de Picardie Jules Verne (FR)
Corresponding author
Sarazin, Catherine
Venue
Carbohydrate Polymers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
805-813
ISSN
0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165380189
Cited by
63
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carbohydrate Polymers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Conseil Régional de Picardie
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
Keywords
ionic liquid pretreatment, cellulose, enzymatic saccharification, ionic liquid recycling, cellulosic ethanol, glucose yield, imidazolium ionic liquids, cellulose solubilization
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Cellulose, Enzymes, Hydrolysis, Polysaccharides, Temperature, Equipment Reuse, Biomass, Bioreactors, Ionic Liquids, Batch Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review