An overview on antimicrobial and wound healing properties of ZnO nanobiofilms, hydrogels, and bionanocomposites based on cellulose, chitosan, and alginate polymers
Abstract
Release of Zn 2+ ions from zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) is a major mechanism for oligodynamic activities of these metal oxide NPs against eukaryotic and prokaryotic microorganisms. In addition to this mechanism, ZnO NPs can form reactive oxygen species (ROSs) resulted from electron-hole formation under certain light wavelength. These properties with suitable biocompatibility and biodegradability of ZnO NPs compared to other metal NPs have caused higher applications of these nanomaterials in therapeutic and cosmetic fields. Recently, natural polymers including cellulose, chitosan, and alginate polymers have gained more attention as safe and cost-effective scaffold for wound healing. Both ZnO NPs and these polymers have not been able to satisfy related patients. In this way, the coupling of these materials and nanomaterials as nanocomposites (NCs) is an alternative way to increase the mechanical and antibacterial properties of wound-healing tissue scaffolds. Controllable release of Zn 2+ ions in physiological medium should be considered as an indispensable factor to obtain appropriate industrial formulation. Therefore, in this review, attempts were made to highlight particularly important antibacterial results of these NCs in recent investigations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Polysaccharides like cellulose, chitosan, and alginate contribute useful properties such as gelation, antimicrobial activity, and ease of modification.
“Polysaccharides like cellulose, chitosan, and alginate contribute useful properties such as gelation, antimicrobial activity, and ease of modification [7,8].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alavi, M., & Nokhodchi, A.
- Affiliations
- Razi University (IR)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Alavi, Mehran
- Nokhodchi, Ali
- Venue
- Carbohydrate Polymers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 227
- Pages
- 115349
- ISSN
- 0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2974428678
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Carbohydrate Polymers (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Keywords
- zinc oxide nanoparticles, antimicrobial activity, wound healing, hydrogels, bionanocomposites, cellulose, chitosan, alginate, zinc ion release, reactive oxygen species, oligodynamic effect, antibacterial nanocomposites, tissue engineering scaffolds, biodegradable nanomaterials
- MeSH terms
- Alginates, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cellulose, Humans, Wound Healing, Zinc Oxide, Hydrogels, Chitosan, Nanoparticles, Nanocomposites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review