The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rates of Spironolactone Initiation and Subsequent Hyperkalemia Hospitalizations in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Following the TOPCAT trial: A Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries
Abstract
Background The impact of the TOPCAT trial publication on spironolactone initiation and subsequent hospitalizations for hyperkalemia among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has not been evaluated empirically. Methods and results We designed a cohort study using US Medicare fee-for-service data. Annual cohorts of patients with HFpEF from 2013 to 2018 were identified based on a validated claims-based phenotyping model. We determined spironolactone initiation in each annual cohort overall and within subgroups with hyperkalemia risk factors of baseline renin-angiotensin system inhibitors use, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. We reported incidence rates of hospitalization for hyperkalemia within 6 months of treatment initiation. A total of 621,171 patients with HFpEF (mean age 80 ± 8 years, 62.9% female) were included. We identified 40,241 initiations of spironolactone with initiation rate/100 person-years of 16.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.4-17.1) in 2013 and increasing to 19.9 (95% CI 19.4-20.5) in 2018. Among initiators, we identified a total of 164 hyperkalemia hospitalization with stable incidence rates per 1000 person-years between 2013 (12.0, 95% CI 8.8-16.1) and 2018 (10.6, 95% CI 6.2-17.0). These results were consistent for all subgroups. Conclusions After the dissemination of TOPCAT findings, we noted a steady increase in the initiation of spironolactone, but not in hyperkalemia hospitalizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information on heart failure symptoms and measurements of ejection fraction were not drawn by standardized assessments but measured by a validated claims-based algorithm with a high positive predictive value of 91%.
“Third, information on heart failure symptoms and measurements of ejection fraction were not drawn by standardized assessments but measured by a validated claims-based algorithm with a high positive predictive value of 91%.28”
From Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Pfeffer, 2015, Regional variation in patients and outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial, Circulation, 131, 34, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013255 · DOI
- Pitt, 2014, Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, N Engl J Med, 370, 1383, 10.1056/NEJMoa1313731 · DOI · Paper page
- Yancy, 2017, J Card Fail, 23, 628, 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.014 · DOI
- Juurlink, 2004, Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study, N Engl J Med, 351, 543, 10.1056/NEJMoa040135 · DOI · Paper page
- Desai, 2018, Development and preliminary validation of a Medicare claims–based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 11, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004700 · DOI
- Desai, 2016, After TOPCAT: what to do now in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Eur Heart J, 37, 3135, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw114 · DOI
- Waitzman, 2021, Finerenone: fiddling with hyperkalemia?, Am J Kidney Dis, 78, 760, 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.07.006 · DOI
- Anker, 2020, Baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the EMPEROR-Preserved Trial, Eur J Heart Fail, 22, 2383, 10.1002/ejhf.2064 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Krüger, N., Schneeweiss, S., Fuse, K., Matseyko, S., Sreedhara, S. K., Hahn, G., Schunkert, H., & Wang, S. V. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.14092 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Desai, R. J., SOLOMON, S. D., & VADUGANATHAN, M.
- ORCID
- Desai, RISHI J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiac Failure
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1035-1039
- ISSN
- 1071-9164
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review