Cited by 118Cardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionMitochondrial Function and PathologyOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Reduced reactive O2 species formation and preserved mitochondrial NADH and [Ca2+] levels during short-term 17 °C ischemia in intact hearts

Riess, M·2004·Cardiovascular Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Different cardioprotective strategies such as ischemic or pharmacologic preconditioning lead to attenuated ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury with less mechanical dysfunction and reduced infarct size on reperfusion. Improved mitochondrial function during ischemia as well as on reperfusion is a key feature of cardioprotection. The best reversible cardioprotective strategy is hypothermia. We investigated mitochondrial protection before, during, and after hypothermic ischemia by measuring mitochondrial (m)Ca2+, NADH, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) by online spectrophotofluorometry in intact hearts. METHODS: A fiberoptic cable was placed against the left ventricle of Langendorff-prepared guinea pig hearts to excite and record transmyocardial fluorescence at the appropriate wavelengths during 37 and 17 degrees C perfusion and during 30 min ischemia at 37 and 17 degrees C before 120 min reperfusion/rewarming. RESULTS: Cold perfusion caused significant reversible increases in m[Ca2+], NADH, and ROS. Hypothermia prevented a further increase in m[Ca2+], excess ROS formation and NADH oxidation/reduction imbalance during ischemia, led to a rapid return to preischemic values on warm reperfusion, and preserved cardiac function and tissue viability on reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermic perfusion at 17 degrees C caused moderate and reversible changes in mitochondrial function. However, hypothermia protects during ischemia, as shown by preservation of mitochondrial NADH energy balance and prevention of deleterious increases in m[Ca2+] and ROS formation. The close temporal relations of these factors during cooling and during ischemia suggest a causal link between mCa2+, mitochondrial energy balance, and ROS production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.09.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 118

Authors
Riess, M.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Riess, M
Venue
Cardiovascular Research
Published
2004-02-15
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
580-590
ISSN
0008-6363 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005139194
Cited by
118
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 58691, R01HL058691)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
myocardial ischemia, ischemia-reperfusion injury, mitochondrial calcium, mitochondrial NADH, reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial bioenergetics, cold perfusion, reperfusion, mitochondrial function, guinea pig heart
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Cold Temperature, Guinea Pigs, Mitochondria, Heart, Myocardial Contraction, NAD, Perfusion, Myocardial Ischemia, Reactive Oxygen Species, Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review