The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
PEATMAP is a GIS shapefile dataset shows a distribution of peatlands that covers the entire world. It was produced by combining the most high quality available peatland map from a wide variety of sources that describe peatland distributions at global, regional and national levels. The following sequence of comparisons to discriminate between overlapping data sources were used: (1) Relevance. The most important criterion was that source data are able to identify peatlands faithfully and to distinguish them from other land cover types, especially non-peat forming wetlands. (2) Spatial resolution. In areas where two or more overlapping data sources were indistinguishable in terms of their relevance to peatlands, the dataset with the finest spatial resolution was selected. (3) Age. In any areas where two or more overlapping datasets were indistinguishable based on both their apparent relevance to peatlands and their spatial resolution, the data product that had been most recently updated was selected. Recently updated products commonly contain much older source data, the period over which the latest revision source data were collected as the primary measure of the age of a dataset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area
Davidson, N. C. (2014) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf14173 · Cited by 2,177
The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997
Page, S. E., Siegert, F., Rieley, J. O., Boehm, H.-D. V., Jaya, A., & Limin, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01131 · Cited by 1,885
Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool
Scharlemann, J. P., Tanner, E. V., Hiederer, R., & Kapos, V. (2014) · Carbon Management · doi:10.4155/cmt.13.77 · Cited by 1,612
Cited by
Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries
Fluet-Chouinard, E., Stocker, B. D., Zhang, Z., Malhotra, A., Melton, J. R., Poulter, B., Kaplan, J. O., Goldewijk, K. K., Siebert, S., Minayeva, T., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05572-6 · Cited by 964
Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink
Loisel, J., Gallego-Sala, A. V., Amesbury, M. J., Magnan, G., Anshari, G., Beilman, D. W., Benavides, J. C., Blewett, J., Camill, P., Charman, D. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00944-0 · Cited by 445
Impacts of historical ditching on peat volume and carbon in northern Minnesota USA peatlands
Krause, L., McCullough, K. J., Kane, E. S., Kolka, R. K., Chimner, R. A., & Lilleskov, E. A. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113090 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, J., Morris, P. J., Liu, J., & Holden, J.
- Venue
- CATENA
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 160
- Pages
- 134-140
- ISSN
- 0341-8162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2760606075
- Cited by
- 904
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010
- The paper
- Xu, J., Morris, P. J., Liu, J., & Holden, J. (2018). PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. CATENA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
