Ion mobility in the pharmaceutical industry: an established biophysical technique or still niche?
Abstract
Over the past decade ion mobility (IM) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a wide spread analytical technique, utilized in research areas ranging from small molecule to proteins analyzed under native-MS and solution conditions. The ion-neutral collision cross section (Ω) derived from an IM experiment can be used to make inferences about the ion's size, shape and charge distribution, when compared to molecular dynamic (MD) or quantum mechanically (QM) derived candidate structures. IM can also be used as an orthogonal separation technique when coupled with liquid chromatographic (LC) separations. IM has been readily adopted by academic research groups and has been demonstrated to be highly enabling, resulting in the inception of completely new research areas, such as gas-phase structural biology. The same cannot be said for IM in pharma, where it is still perceived as a standalone, research-only based analytical tool. Herein, we will describe key innovations of IM instrumentation by current MS vendors and IMs application within academic and pharmaceutical research and how these developments have been, and can be applied to research discovery efforts within the pharmaceutical industry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Binding of ligands, cofactors, or metal ions can affect the observed structure, with important implications for drug discovery.
“and that binding of ligands, cofactors, or metal ions can affect the observed structure, with important implications for e.g., drug discovery.”
From Higher-order structural characterisation of native proteins and complexes by top-down mass spectrometry (2020) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 126 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Campuzano, I. D., & Lippens, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Amgen (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Campuzano, Iain DG
- ORCID
- Lippens, Jennifer L
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 147-159
- ISSN
- 1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2783290581
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Keywords
- ion mobility spectrometry, pharmaceutical industry, drug discovery
- MeSH terms
- Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Chromatography, Liquid, Drug Industry, Quantum Theory, Mass Spectrometry, Biophysical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review