Cited by 25Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Network biology bridges the gaps between quantitative genetics and multi-omics to map complex diseases

Wu, Si, Chen, Dijun, Snyder, Michael P.·2022·Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Abstract

With advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies, quantitative genetics approaches have provided insights into genetic basis of many complex diseases. Emerging in-depth multi-omics profiling technologies have created exciting opportunities for systematically investigating intricate interaction networks with different layers of biological molecules underlying disease etiology. Herein, we summarized two main categories of biological networks: evidence-based and statistically inferred. These different types of molecular networks complement each other at both bulk and single-cell levels. We also review three main strategies to incorporate quantitative genetics results with multi-omics data by network analysis: (a) network propagation, (b) functional module-based methods, (c) comparative/dynamic networks. These strategies not only aid in elucidating molecular mechanisms of complex diseases but can guide the search for therapeutic targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.102101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low dimensional embeddings of EHR data can be generated by separately considering medical services, doctors, and patients in shallow network embeddings and graph neural networks.

    “Low dimensional embeddings of EHR data can be generated by separately considering medical services, doctors, and patients in shallow network embeddings (Section 2.1) and graph neural networks (Section 2.2) [202, 203].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [202]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 25

Authors
Wu, S., Chen, D., & Snyder, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (CN)
Corresponding author
Snyder, Michael P.
Venue
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
66
Pages
102101
ISSN
1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215020121
Cited by
25
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1U2CCA233311-01, 5RM1HG00773508)
  • Stanford University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
network biology, quantitative genetics, multi-omics integration, complex diseases, biological networks, network propagation, functional modules, dynamic networks, single-cell networks, therapeutic target discovery, etiology
MeSH terms
Computational Biology, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review