Particulate pollution and its toxicity to fish: An overview
Abstract
Aquatic ecosystems cover more than two-thirds of the Earth's surface and play a vital role in maintaining a stable global temperature and providing various benefits to an expanding human population. However, human activities are causing negative effects on these ecosystems. Particulate matter (PM) refers to tiny particles with a variable composition and a diameter of <100 μm. These particles can settle in water and be consumed by fish, posing a health hazard to them. Additionally, these particles can scatter light, which can negatively impact the growth of plants and algae in the water, and ultimately affect the aquatic food chain. Particle pollution can transport contaminants, such as toxic heavy metals and organic compounds, which can accumulate in fish tissues and be ingested by humans. These pollutants can harm aquatic life through various processes, such as physical damage, ingestion, bioaccumulation, light attenuation, and toxicity. This review article specifically focuses on different sources of particulate matter that impact fish and the mechanisms by which these pollutants can cause toxicity in fish.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Suspended macroparticles constitute a distinct physical route of exposure that can obstruct respiratory surfaces, impair feeding, and prolong exposure through gradual leaching and ingestion.
“In contrast, suspended macroparticles constitute a distinct physical route of exposure that can obstruct respiratory surfaces, impair feeding, and prolong exposure through gradual leaching and ingestion [16,17].”
From Wildfire Ash Alters Freshwater Crustacean Behavior: Disentangling the Contributions of Suspended Macroparticles and Ash‐Induced Alkalinization (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 134 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Gokul, T., Kumar, K. R., Prema, P., Arun, A., Balaji, P., & Faggio, C.
- Affiliations
- Alagappa University (IN)
- University of Messina (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Balaji, Paulraj
- Faggio, Caterina
- Venue
- Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 270
- Pages
- 109646
- ISSN
- 1532-0456 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4376113934
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Keywords
- particulate matter, particulate matter pollution, fish toxicity, aquatic ecosystems, heavy metals, organic pollutants, bioaccumulation, light attenuation, ingestion, aquatic food chain, human health risk
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Environmental Pollutants, Fishes, Humans, Plants, Temperature, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Particulate Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review