Cited by 1Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyAmphibian and Reptile Biology

Microplastics selectively modify ranavirus-driven physiological disruption and gut microbiome restructuring in amphibians

Park, Jun-Kyu, Lee, Ji-Eun, Kim, Jun-Sung, Kim, Min Sun, Do, Yuno·2026·Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology

Abstract

Amphibians often face overlapping infectious and environmental stressors that interact with non-equivalent magnitudes. We investigated the combined effects of microplastics (MPs) and ranavirus (RV) on the physiology and gut microbiome of the white tree frog (Litoria caerulea). Using a multiblock approach, we integrated diverse endpoints including corticosterone (CORT), body condition, serum biochemistry, antioxidant activity, and gut microbiome profiles. RV was the major driver of host variation, significantly disrupting body condition, protein homeostasis, bioenergetic budget, and renal/hepatic functions. While direct MP effects include CORT, bioenergetic budget and antioxidant defense, increased MP intensity amplified RV viral load, infection rates, and overall physiological disruption. The gut microbiome exhibited significant structural restructuring in weighted and unweighted UniFrac analyses, despite unchanged alpha diversity. Integrated analysis revealed that exposure history was primarily reflected in host physiology, with microbial features providing secondary, structured signals. We conclude that RV is the primary physiological disruptor, while MPs act as a modifier that exacerbates these responses. These changes represent a hidden cost that increases ecological risk in amphibians, even in the absence of overt clinical signs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpc.2026.110610

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Park, J.-K., Lee, J.-E., Kim, J.-S., Kim, M. S., & Do, Y.
Affiliations
Kongju National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Do, Yuno
Venue
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-10
Volume
308
Pages
110610
ISSN
1532-0456 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7167623989
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Keywords
microplastics, ranavirus, Litoria caerulea, corticosterone, body condition, antioxidant activity, liver and kidney function, viral load, combined stress, ecological risk
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Microplastics, Animals, Anura, Corticosterone, DNA Virus Infections, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ranavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review