Cited by 58Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Transdiagnostic Theory and Application of Family-Based Treatment for Youth With Eating Disorders

Open access
Loeb, Katharine L., Lock, James, Greif, Rebecca, Le Grange, Daniel·2012·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Abstract

This paper describes the transdiagnostic theory and application of family-based treatment (FBT) for children and adolescents with eating disorders. We review the fundamentals of FBT, a transdiagnostic theoretical model of FBT and the literature supporting its clinical application, adaptations across developmental stages and the diagnostic spectrum of eating disorders, and the strengths and challenges of this approach, including its suitability for youth. Finally, we report a case study of an adolescent female with eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) for whom FBT was effective. We conclude that FBT is a promising outpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and their EDNOS variants. The transdiagnostic model of FBT posits that while the etiology of an eating disorder is unknown, the pathology affects the family and home environment in ways that inadvertently allow for symptom maintenance and progression. FBT directly targets and resolves family level variables, including secrecy, blame, internalization of illness, and extreme active or passive parental responses to the eating disorder. Future research will test these mechanisms, which are currently theoretical.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2010.04.005

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loeb, K. L., Lock, J., Greif, R., & Le Grange, D.
Affiliations
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Loeb, Katharine L.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
17-30
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978891770
Cited by
58
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23mh074506-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23-MH074506, K08MH001457, R01MH079979, K24MH074467)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
family-based treatment, transdiagnostic model, eating disorders, youth, adolescents, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, eating disorder not otherwise specified, family environment, parental reactions, symptom maintenance, outpatient care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review