Cited by 51Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceSchool Health and Nursing EducationChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Developing an online early detection system for school attendance problems: results from a research-community partnership

Chu, Brian C., Guarino, Denise, Mele, Christina, O’Connell, Jean, Coto, Patricia·2019·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.09.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 51

Authors
Chu, B. C., Guarino, D., Mele, C., O’Connell, J., & Coto, P.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Chu, Brian C.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896299502
Cited by
51
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
school refusal, school attendance problems, absenteeism, early detection, school counselors, research-community partnerships, at-risk youth, individualized education program, 504 plans, parental divorce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review