Association of cell-free plasma DNA with perioperative mortality in patients with suspected acute mesenteric ischemia
Abstract
Background Diagnosing patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) in the emergency ward is challenging. This study assesses the usefulness of plasma DNA in patients with clinically suspected AMI.Methods 130 consecutive patients who underwent laparotomy were studied. Cell-free plasma DNA was measured by real-time quantitative PCR assay for the beta-globin gene. The primary endpoint was the accuracy of plasma DNA for predicting 30-day mortality.Results Surgery revealed AMI in 99 patients and alternative diagnoses in 31 patients. Forty-six patients with AMI died (46.6%) as compared to 6 (19.4%) in the non-AMI group (p<0.05). The DNA concentration at admission was significantly higher in patients with AMI (median 7340 GE/ml, versus, 2735 GE/ml, p<0.01) and in AMI patients who died (8830 GE/ml, versus 4970 GE/ml, p<0.05). The area under the ROC curves for plasma DNA as a marker for mesenteric ischemia and independent predictor for 30-day mortality were 0.708 (95% CI 0.701-0.890) and 0.815 (95% CI 0.735-0.894). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of hospital mortality increased 1.52-fold for every 1000 GE/ml increase in plasma DNA.Conclusions Plasma DNA levels may be a useful biomarker in predicting the outcome of patients with AMI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cell-free plasma DNA had sensitivity 54% and specificity 84% in a single study.
“Cell-free plasma DNA (54 and 84%) [93].”
From Diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers to detect acute mesenteric ischaemia in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [93]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Arnalich, F., Maldifassi, M. C., Ciria, E., Quesada, A., Codoceo, R., Herruzo, R., Garcia-Cerrada, C., Montoya, F., Vazquez, J. J., López-Collazo, E., & Montiel, C.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Arnalich, Francisco
- Venue
- Clinica Chimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 411
- Issue
- 17-18
- Pages
- 1269-1274
- ISSN
- 0009-8981 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984057530
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundación Mutua Madrileña
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- acute mesenteric ischemia, plasma cell-free DNA, circulating tumor DNA, perioperative mortality, 30-day mortality, beta-globin gene, biomarkers, diagnostic accuracy, laparotomy, emergency diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Base Sequence, Cell-Free System, DNA, Female, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Mesentery, Middle Aged, ROC Curve, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Hospital Mortality, DNA Primers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review