Interference of hemoglobin variants in HbA1c quantification
Abstract
Fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) are routine biomarkers to screen and monitor diabetes mellitus. HbA 1c results from glycation at the N-terminus of the β globin chain of tetrameric human hemoglobin. Fasting blood glucose level varies with the nature and amount of food intake, physical exercise, etc., and, accordingly, is a short-term measure of glucose control. In contrast, HbA 1c provides an average measure of glucose control for the long-term (8-12 weeks). Unfortunately, genetic variants of hemoglobin may interfere with HbA 1c quantification using ion exchange chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, immunoassay and boronate affinity chromatography. Mass spectrometry, however, measures total glycation of hemoglobin across both α and β globin chains and correlates well with the ion exchange based method. Additionally, mass spectrometry based quantification is not impacted by the presence of genetic variants of hemoglobin and thus might be a better analytical choice for diabetes mellitus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analytical interference from hemoglobin variants or elevated fetal hemoglobin is a concern.
“An additional concern is analytical interference from hemoglobin variants or elevated fetal hemoglobin.”
From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
Hemoglobin variants may interfere with HbA1c measurement through multiple mechanisms: altering the glycation site, affecting the charge or conformation of the protein, or modifying red blood cell lifespan.
“Depending on the nature and location of the mutation, these variants may interfere with HbA1c measurement through multiple mechanisms: Altering the glycation site, affecting the charge or conformation of the protein, or modifying red blood cell lifespan (46).”
From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Yadav, N., & Kumar Mandal, A.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata (IN)
- ORCID
- Yadav, Neha
- Venue
- Clinica Chimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 539
- Pages
- 55-65
- ISSN
- 0009-8981 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311093384
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- hemoglobin variants, HbA1c, mass spectrometry, ion-exchange chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, immunoassay, boronate affinity chromatography, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, hemoglobin glycation
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hemoglobins, Humans, beta-Globins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review