Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular, Pathological, Radiological, and Immune Profiling of Non-brainstem Pediatric High-Grade Glioma from the HERBY Phase II Randomized Trial

Open access
Mackay, Alan, Burford, Anna, Molinari, Valeria, Jones, David T.W., Izquierdo, Elisa, Brouwer-Visser, Jurriaan, Giangaspero, Felice, Haberler, Christine, Pietsch, Torsten, Jacques, Thomas S., Figarella-Branger, Dominique, Rodriguez, Daniel, Morgan, Paul S., Raman, Pichai, Waanders, Angela J., Resnick, Adam C., Massimino, Maura, Garrè, Maria Luisa, Smith, Helen, Capper, David, Pfister, Stefan M., Würdinger, Thomas, Tam, Rachel, Garcia, Josep, Thakur, Meghna Das, Vassal, Gilles, Grill, Jacques, Jaspan, Tim, Varlet, Pascale, Jones, Chris·2018·Cancer Cell

Abstract

The HERBY trial was a phase II open-label, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) in addition to temozolomide/radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed non-brainstem high-grade glioma (HGG) between the ages of 3 and 18 years. We carried out comprehensive molecular analysis integrated with pathology, radiology, and immune profiling. In post-hoc subgroup analysis, hypermutator tumors (mismatch repair deficiency and somatic POLE / POLD1 mutations) and those biologically resembling pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma ([PXA]-like, driven by BRAF _V600E or NF1 mutation) had significantly more CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and longer survival with the addition of BEV. Histone H3 subgroups (hemispheric G34R/V and midline K27M) had a worse outcome and were immune cold. Future clinical trials will need to take into account the diversity represented by the term "HGG" in the pediatric population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.04.004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Mackay, A., Burford, A., Molinari, V., Jones, D. T. W., Izquierdo, E., Brouwer-Visser, J., Giangaspero, F., Haberler, C., Pietsch, T., Jacques, T. S., Figarella-Branger, D., Rodriguez, D., Morgan, P. S., Raman, P., Waanders, A. J., Resnick, A. C., Massimino, M., Garrè, M. L., Smith, H., Capper, D., Pfister, S. M., Würdinger, T., Tam, R., Garcia, J., Thakur, M. D., Vassal, G., Grill, J., Jaspan, T., Varlet, P., & Jones, C.
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
829-842.e5
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803003012
Cited by
221
References
6
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular, Pathological, Radiological, and Immune Profiling of Non-brainstem Pediatric High-Grade Glioma from the HERBY Phase II Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.04.004
The paper
Mackay, A., Burford, A., Molinari, V., Jones, D. T. W., Izquierdo, E., Brouwer-Visser, J., Giangaspero, F., Haberler, C., Pietsch, T., Jacques, T. S., Figarella-Branger, D., Rodriguez, D., Morgan, P. S., Raman, P., Waanders, A. J., Resnick, A. C., Massimino, M., Garrè, M. L., Smith, H., . . . Jones, C. (2018). Molecular, Pathological, Radiological, and Immune Profiling of Non-brainstem Pediatric High-Grade Glioma from the HERBY Phase II Randomized Trial. Cancer Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.04.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.